Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 10:29:48 03/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 02, 1999 at 14:40:51, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On March 02, 1999 at 14:21:32, Stuart Cracraft wrote: > >>On March 01, 1999 at 13:56:34, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >> >>>On March 01, 1999 at 13:36:14, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >>> >>>>On February 28, 1999 at 11:30:53, Larry Griffiths wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 28, 1999 at 00:30:20, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 26, 1999 at 20:28:44, Larry Griffiths wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On February 26, 1999 at 20:01:12, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The new GNU Chess takes about 2 1/4 minutes on a non-dedicated >>>>>>>>SUN Enterprise-class machine. Includes the usual full leaf >>>>>>>>evaluation (since exclusive pc/sq tables have been largely >>>>>>>>discredited as well as the usual lazy eval.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I don't see what point this test has since whoever can throw >>>>>>>>the most iron at it "wins". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>GNU 5.0 Chess Program >>>>>>>>Version 5.00d (17 Dec 1998) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Transposition table: Entries=256K Size=8192K >>>>>>>>Pawn hash table: Entries=32K Size=2048K >>>>>>>>White (1) : post >>>>>>>>White (1) : force >>>>>>>>White (1) : e4 >>>>>>>>1. e4 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>black KQkq e3 >>>>>>>>r n b q k b n r >>>>>>>>p p p p p p p p >>>>>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>>>>. . . . P . . . >>>>>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>>>>P P P P . P P P >>>>>>>>R N B Q K B N R >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Black (1) : depth 10 >>>>>>>>Black (1) : go >>>>>>>>Root score = -30 Phase = 0 Depth = 10 >>>>>>>> no book. >>>>>>>> 1. 0 0 24 d5 >>>>>>>> 2& -25 0 97 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 >>>>>>>> 2. -25 1 144 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 >>>>>>>> 3& -28 1 495 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 >>>>>>>> 3& 0 2 867 e5 Nc3 Nc6 >>>>>>>> 3. 0 4 1654 e5 Nc3 Nc6 >>>>>>>> 4& -24 5 2265 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 >>>>>>>> 4. -24 7 4145 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 >>>>>>>> 5& 0 13 8311 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 >>>>>>>> 5. 0 18 11087 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 >>>>>>>> 6& -16 38 24524 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Bd6 d4 Bxe5 dxe5 Nxe4 >>>>>>>> 6. -16 59 41123 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Bd6 d4 Bxe5 dxe5 Nxe4 >>>>>>>> 7& -1 149 105799 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe4 Qf3 Nf6 >>>>>>>> 7& 0 224 159010 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Be2 Bb4 >>>>>>>> 7. 0 282 196049 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Be2 Bb4 >>>>>>>> 8& -20 492 347056 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 d5 e5 Ne4 Bb5 >>>>>>>> 8. -20 799 574902 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 d5 e5 Ne4 Bb5 >>>>>>>> 9& -10 1266 901912 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Ng4 d4 d5 h3 Nh6 >>>>>>>> 9. -10 2430 1753901 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Ng4 d4 d5 h3 Nh6 >>>>>>>>10& -26 4386 3127413 Nc6 Nf3 e5 Bb5 Bc5 c3 Nf6 d3 Ng4 O-O >>>>>>>>10& -14 10337 7390952 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 c5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 d4 dxe5 dxe5 >>>>>>>>10. -14 13640 9769398 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 c5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 d4 dxe5 >>>>>>>>Time = 136.4 Rate=71623 Nodes=[8776563/992835/9769398] GenCnt=11519786 >>>>>>>>Eval=[1138817/4174540] RptCnt=915 NullCut=338736 FutlCut=757941 >>>>>>>>Ext: Chk=230000 Recap=86348 Pawn=18800 OneRep=16654 Horz=5813 Thrt=0 >>>>>>>>Material=[3600/3600 : 4400/4400] Worst=[-92/-104] >>>>>>>>Hash: Success=10% Collision=82% Pawn=63% >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>white KQkq >>>>>>>>r n b q k b . r >>>>>>>>p p p p p p p p >>>>>>>>. . . . . n . . >>>>>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>>>>. . . . P . . . >>>>>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>>>>P P P P . P P P >>>>>>>>R N B Q K B N R >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>My move is : Nf6 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Stuart, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I wanted to know how my program stands at this time compared with other >>>>>>>programs. I see now that I still have a lot of work to do to improve >>>>>>>the performance of my program. I ask my self "What makes these other >>>>>>>programs run so fast". I have asked more questions here and have found >>>>>>>some great things to try. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Thanks for your response. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Larry :-0 >>>>>> >>>>>>Don't sell yourself short. What hardware are you running on and what >>>>>>is your result for the same 10-ply post 1. e4 search? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>It took 22 minutes to 10 plys on a pentium 350. >>>>> >>>>>Larry. >>>> >>>>Wow! I didn't realize a Pentium 350mhz was that slow compared to a >>>>mid-range Ultra-Sparc. >>>> >>>>Stuart >>> >>>Something must be wrong here. PII/350 cannot be 4 times slower >>>than *any* Sparc. >>> >>>Eugene >> >>Yeah. That's what I thought! >> >>Larry? > >If you want, you can send source of beta to me. I'll make an >experiment on PII/400, as well as integrate it with my EGTBs >(sorry, I cannot seriously test it - *any* program will win >against me). > >Eugene Will do. Let me get back to the development platform and send you the code. Please send your email address to cracraft@earthlink.net. By the way, it is possible to improve a program without being a strong player. Claude Jarry of L'Excentrique and Ken Thompson of Belle proved it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.