Author: Roger Brown
Date: 16:13:51 09/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
>If it is copied protected in another gui then it is not a winboard engine by my >definition. Hello Uri, At least you said by your definition which falls flat in the face of objective fact. The King is a Winboard engine. It can be used in Winboard - witness Leo's WBEC etc. It cannot be used without a code supplied by the CM gui (do not laugh here!) but it is a Winbaord engine. Nothing you or I say changes that. > >My definition is that a winboard engine is an engine that can be used under >winboard without a need for another exe file like polyglot. There is at least one Winboard engine which is improved by running it through Polyglot to my certain knowledge. However, I accept this part... > >If the engine that customers use cannot be used under winboard because of copy >protection then it is not a winboard engine even if the programmer implemented >the winboard protocol. Which engine would this be Uri? :-) Later.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.