Author: Alex Shalamanov
Date: 07:39:31 09/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2005 at 06:00:39, Uri Blass wrote: >I think that your information is misleading and you need to show me a tournament >in the last years when Tunc performed better than van Oosterom. BTW, no-one is comparing Kasym's results with whoever was before him, be it Kaspi or Kramnik. So I'd rather not do the same thing. ;) > >I think that 11/14 is better than 12/16 Oh, really? I thought he should win it 100% score, were the hardware matter so weighty or , at least, repeat Umansky's result (7/8) made in a champion's tourney. >4)I did not say that van Oosterom may want Zappa to play for him but only that >he can use it as a tool to improve his results and I am sure that chess programs >and better hardware can help to improve the results of players. > >Uri The hardware counts little,if CC players have poor guts. You're likely to trust the silicon monsters too much, ain't ya? And Zappa is not the best software for a CC player. You wanna know which is #1? Of course, Hiarcs is, like Anand believes. So I just share his opinion. Alex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.