Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:31:20 09/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2005 at 15:15:03, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On September 16, 2005 at 14:57:00, Mike van Rooyen wrote: > >>I think that the new Hiarcs(as it has already proved) is stronger than Zappa is >>now.Zappa has not performed that well on Playchess and I think Andrew knows >>that. >>If it was released and it didn't top the lists,he would have received a lot >>of flak. >>Mike > > > I fully understand Antony Cozzie. In some forums people > have tried to make Zappa bad before its release and if > I were the programmer, I would under such circumstances > never have made Zappa WCCC 2005 (commercially) available. > Nevertheless it's of course a pity -:( > Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] I do not know Antony's reasons and it is not clear to me that some posts in forums that almost no customer read is a reason for him not to release Zappa. Note that the main question is what is the playing strength of it and it is a pity that Anatony does not let us to know by giving it a similiar test to Fruit WCCC's test. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.