Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 19:22:45 09/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2005 at 21:54:13, Christos Gitsis wrote: >On September 16, 2005 at 14:17:03, Derek Paquette wrote: > >>If you think about it, fritz never has to produce a strong chess engine again. >>They've openly stated they don't care about machine vs machine, only about man >>vs machine. So why not just keep improving the GUI, produce the same fritz >>engine year in and year out and just say that it keeps getting stronger vs >>humans since no one can prove it, including them. >> >>Its the perfect cost saving measure, >> >>any thoughts? > >I think that ChessBase will have problems only if other engines get much >stronger than Fritz. In that case, many players will want to have the strongest >engine for analysing games, and ChessBase will have to do something about that. >But for the time being, they are ok. If they throw a big enough bucket of money at the problem, it is likely that ChessBase could get Fabien and/or Anthony to write them a ChessBase version. Why not? Probably the same goes for: ChessAssistant Lokasoft UBISoft ShredderChess etc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.