Author: Richard Sutherland
Date: 19:31:50 09/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2005 at 19:33:06, David Dahlem wrote: > >Your definition if wrong. If an engine supports the winboard protocol, it is a >winboard engine, regardless of which interface it works under. > >Regards >Dave I'm sorry, but his definition is not wrong. If the engine does not work under winboard, but only under Majoestic, then it is a Majestic engine and NOT a winboard engine.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.