Author: Graham Banks
Date: 23:23:22 09/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 2005 at 01:52:09, Peter Skinner wrote: >On September 17, 2005 at 01:16:19, Graham Banks wrote: > >>Hi Peter, >> >>I prefer to remain impartial on this question as I don't want to be seen to be >>upsetting my fellow nominees or trying to influence the voting. >>Thanks for your kind comments however! :-) >>I'm by no means a favourite as far as I'm concerned as I was nominated late, >>almost like an afterthought! >> >>Regards, Graham. > >I don't think it would be upsetting the other nominees, nor influence the >voting. > >I gave my personal preferences based off what I read in the nominee >philosophies. > >And never think of yourself as an after thought. Someone thought enough of you >to put your name in the hat, and risk that you might get elected and have to >help moderated all these hellians :) > >Peter Having read all of the nominee statements, I would be happy to work with any combination if I am successful. All statements made go down well with me. I know it still seems as though I'm sitting on the fence, but I honestly don't have a preference. I'm such a boring person! :-) Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.