Author: gerold daniels
Date: 07:05:59 09/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 2005 at 02:23:22, Graham Banks wrote: >On September 17, 2005 at 01:52:09, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On September 17, 2005 at 01:16:19, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>Hi Peter, >>> >>>I prefer to remain impartial on this question as I don't want to be seen to be >>>upsetting my fellow nominees or trying to influence the voting. >>>Thanks for your kind comments however! :-) >>>I'm by no means a favourite as far as I'm concerned as I was nominated late, >>>almost like an afterthought! >>> >>>Regards, Graham. >> >>I don't think it would be upsetting the other nominees, nor influence the >>voting. >> >>I gave my personal preferences based off what I read in the nominee >>philosophies. >> >>And never think of yourself as an after thought. Someone thought enough of you >>to put your name in the hat, and risk that you might get elected and have to >>help moderated all these hellians :) >> >>Peter > > >Having read all of the nominee statements, I would be happy to work with any >combination if I am successful. All statements made go down well with me. >I know it still seems as though I'm sitting on the fence, but I honestly don't >have a preference. I'm such a boring person! :-) > >Graham. Just as well get ready you will win hands down. :} Gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.