Author: David Dahlem
Date: 08:01:40 09/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2005 at 22:31:50, Richard Sutherland wrote: >On September 15, 2005 at 19:33:06, David Dahlem wrote: > >> >>Your definition if wrong. If an engine supports the winboard protocol, it is a >>winboard engine, regardless of which interface it works under. >> >>Regards >>Dave > > > >I'm sorry, but his definition is not wrong. If the engine does not work under >winboard, but only under Majoestic, then it is a Majestic engine and NOT a >winboard engine. I'm sorry, but i have to disagree. Majestic is a gui, not an engine protocol. If an engine was programmed to not work in any gui, but was programmed to understand winboard commands in console mode, would you call it a winboard engine? :-) Regards Dave Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.