Author: David H. McClain
Date: 09:11:13 09/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2005 at 20:12:20, Peter Skinner wrote: >Hello everyone, > >In any election there is usually a campaign slandering the other opponents to >gain voter support. > >Since we don't do this here, I thought it would be interesting to try the >_other_ side of that. > >If you were elected, which other two nominees would you like to serve with and >why? > >Well for my own response to the question, I would like to serve with Graham >Banks and Andreas Guettinger. > >I believe that these two people and myself would make a terrific moderation >team. We would also all be first time moderators. > >Andreas and I both state in our philosophies that while arguements sometimes get >heated on the board, personal insults are not warranted. He also mentioned >removing piracy links, and well.. :) > >Graham and I both feel that is a situation were to arise where have to take >action against someone we personally might have a problem, or against a >potential friend, everyone has to remember it is part of the job and it is not >personal against _anyone_. > >While Robert and Thorsten would also make terrific choices, I feel Robert has >been a moderator before, and some new blood should take up the reigns for a >while. Thorsten would make a great moderator as well, and the reason I didn't >pick him as my two choices, was that I didn't "connect" with his philosophy as >well as I did with Graham and Andreas. Nothing less, nothing more. > >Good luck to everyone, and may the best man win :) > >Peter Peter, It's more of a choice of who not to vote for because the choices are all so well qualified. All moderator elections should be as fortunate to have these problems! DHM
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.