Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: An Experiment that disproves Hyatt's 1000X NPS Theory

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 05:04:51 09/18/05

Go up one level in this thread


On September 18, 2005 at 07:44:48, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote:

>Once again you avoid the issue by Calling GNU chess 4 a lousy program.Note that
>Vincent has Compared DeepBlue Evaluation function to GNU chess Eval many
>times.......


To say that Hyatt "avoids" an issue is a special joke.

To say "note" [!] "that Vincent" has compared DB to GNU "many times" is another
highlight of comedy. Just because:

(1) If someone avoids the continuation of a debate and flees into hiding places
until he returns with new insults and allegations, this is the gent you
mentioned.

(2) To insinuate that Prof. Hyatt should note something that came from Vincent,
because it came many times, that is a double assult: a) because Hyatt has
addressed -until this very day- each and every micro idea or insult from Vincent
and b) because THEN Hyatt did prove Vincent wrong in every single detail.

So, it's really funny BTW that one Ali so and so is arguing on such a shaky
ground. Even lays like me can understand it. Above all it must be noted that Bob
is still answering you point after point. So now let's see what you have in your
sleeves. Everybody is desperately hoping that you can beat what Bob has to say.
Holland is hoping.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.