Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 23:31:53 03/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 1999 at 21:20:49, Marc van Hal wrote: >For those who still are not confinced that for computerchess positonal play is >the most important thing in wich they should improve >Human grandmasters still are much better in the playing of openings and it >already start in the opening with strategie and there are not much tactics here >today i played with Rebel10 against Chessmaster6000 and again the fact that >Chessmaster doesnt know how to play with good strategical plans he made a draw >in a position with bischops with the same colour with a pawn more if you would >have chosen in that position to switch sides the game should have been easely >won by Rebel 10 >Anbd it is that Fritz5 or chessmaster can't talk I am sure there wishes would >have been to learn more about positional play with this you can make from a lost >game a draw or when you having a winning position you wont come in unclear >positions anymore Capablanca also once wrote after a very simple game he played >that that just was what made the diference between masters and non masters and >that those simple games mostely where much more dificult then the most beautiful >piece sacrefice for a stunning kings attack >Now many games are played by the programs in wich the score isnt based on good >play from one or the otherside but more as a matter of luck Maybe you could post the game in question so we can have a look at it. Until then I disagree with Fritz and CM6K (I assume) are not poor at positional play
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.