Author: Chan Rasjid
Date: 10:11:06 09/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
Ali - "This is simply wrong ;I looked at the NPS for both programs" On rigorous scientific( == commonsense)methodology, your experiments would not be passed by any sane person. 1) The nps of 500 by chessTiger can only be known to Christopher Theron. GNU chess's 500k, will be known to me if written by me and compiled by me. Reading from lcd/screens has no scientific value here. 2) most importantly, GNU 4.11 may not be fitting for such experiments. Those who know how a chess program works know that some programs can be just not fit for the experiment you have in mind. GNU Chess given 1000x may mean nothing. Maybe given 1 year/move on a top current PC vs.Crafty with 1 day/move and no pondering :- Experiment of the Century ========================= GNU Chess 4.11 - W Crafty 19.00 - B; Result 68 years later:- 0 - 1 Checkmate. Best Regards Chan Rasjid 2005
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.