Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 06:37:45 09/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2005 at 13:11:06, Chan Rasjid wrote: >Ali - >"This is simply wrong ;I looked at the NPS for both programs" > >On rigorous scientific( == commonsense)methodology, your experiments would not >be passed by any sane person. > >1) The nps of 500 by chessTiger can only be known to Christopher Theron. GNU >chess's 500k, will be known to me if written by me and compiled by me. Reading >from lcd/screens has no scientific value here. > >2) most importantly, GNU 4.11 may not be fitting for such experiments. Those > who know how a chess program works know that some programs can be just not > fit for the experiment you have in mind. GNU Chess given 1000x may mean > nothing. Maybe given 1 year/move on a top current PC > vs.Crafty with 1 day/move and no pondering :- > > Experiment of the Century > ========================= > GNU Chess 4.11 - W > Crafty 19.00 - B; > Result 68 years later:- > 0 - 1 Checkmate. > > > >Best Regards >Chan Rasjid >2005 This experiment is SUPERBLY IMPORTANT.What you are saying is that the information on the sreen is Wrong.This is impossible.Where in the World do you get this silly theory????????? In chess Tiger for palm the Engine stats tell the NPS for the position.Obviously I can see that you have non of the programs in addition to the fact that you have done very little testing of chess programs yourself.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.