Author: Eelco de Groot
Date: 08:49:03 09/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hello all,
It is good to see Bruce Moreland back again! He posted something
computerchess-related in CTF once already before but it is good to see him back
here with Ferret!
A few Pro Deo notes on the discussed position; Pro Deo has a bug somewhere with
KBPK handling so that must be a double disadvantage here for Pro Deo. I tried to
find relevant material about the Rebel KBPK bug with the CCC search engine but
could not find any.
There are a few Pro Deo switches that Ed gave us that could have some influence
here and with Bad Bishop engames in general, but I'm having mixed results with
them so far. The position does not have a clear winning or losing variation so
that makes not such a good testposition. All moves are theorethically a draw.
The material scores do not tell everything, for Chess Tiger especially I suspect
that in spite of the big evals it can still play a position well. Harold Faber
has posted to that effect about Tiger evals.
The latest try now with Pro Deo Vulcan sticks to about +5.00 but there are
curious side-effects such as a heap of false fail highs in every iteration.
Could that be bug related? I hope Ed can do something with the material...
First "regular" Pro Deo 1.1 Vulcan {9k16ip}
[D]6k1/6p1/6K1/7P/8/5B2/8/8 w - -
00:00:00 1.00 0.00 1.Kf5
00:00:00 1.05 0.02 1.Bd5 Kh8
00:00:00 2.00 0.02 1.Bd5 Kh8
00:00:00 3.00 0.01 1.Bd5 Kh8 2.Bc4
00:00:00 3.03 0.02 1.Be4 Kh8
00:00:00 4.00 6.18 1.Be4 Kf8 2.Bd5 Ke7 3.Kxg7
00:00:00 5.00 6.18 1.Be4 Kf8 2.Bd5 Ke7 3.Kxg7
00:00:00 6.00 0.06 1.Be4 Kh8 2.Kf7 g5 3.Kg6 g4
00:00:00 6.01 0.14 1.Bd5 Kh8 2.Bg8 Kxg8 3.Kf5 Kf7
00:00:00 7.00 0.16 1.Bd5 Kh8 2.Bg8 Kxg8 3.Kf5 Kf7 4.Ke4
00:00:00 8.00 0.18 1.Bd5 Kh8 2.Bg8 Kxg8 3.Kf5 Kf7 4.Ke5 Ke7
00:00:00 9.00 0.15 1.Bd5 Kh8 2.Bg8 Kxg8 3.Kf5 Kf7 4.Ke5 Ke7 5.Kd4
00:00:00 10.00 0.14 1.Bd5 Kh8 2.Bg8 Kxg8 3.Kf5 Kf7 4.Ke5 Ke7 5.Kd5
Kf6
00:00:00 10.05 0.21 1.Kg5 Kh8 2.Bd5 Kh7 3.Bf7 Kh8 4.Bg8 Kxg8 5.Kg6
Kf8 6.Kf5
00:00:00 11.00 0.19 1.Kg5 Kh7 2.Be4 Kg8 3.Bg6 Kh8 4.Kf5 Kg8 5.Bh7
Kxh7 6.Ke6 Kh6 7.Kd6 Kxh5
00:00:00 12.00 0.25 1.Kg5 Kh7 2.Be4 Kg8 3.Bg6 Kh8 4.Kf5 Kg8 5.Bh7
Kxh7 6.Kg5 Kg8 7.Kf5 Kf7 8.Ke5 Ke7 9.h6 gxh6
00:00:00 13.00 2.67 1.Kg5 Kh7 2.Bd5 Kh8 3.Be4 Kg8 4.Kg6 Kh8 5.Bd3
Kg8 6.Kf5 Kh7 7.Ke5 Kg8 8.Kf5 Kh7 9.Ke5 Kg8
00:00:00 14.00 2.85 1.Kg5 Kh7 2.Be4 Kg8 3.Kf4 Kh8 4.Ke5 Kg8 5.Ke6
Kh8 6.Bf5 Kg8 7.Bc2 Kh8 8.Bg6 Kg8 9.Bd3 Kf8
10.Kd5 Kg8 11.Kd4 Kh8 12.Be4 Kg8
00:00:00 15.00 2.75 1.Kg5 Kh7 2.Kf5 Kh6 3.Kf4 g6 4.Be4 gxh5 5.Bg6
Kxg6 6.Kg3 h4 7.Kh3 Kf6 8.Kxh4
00:00:02 16.00 0.27 1.Kg5 Kh7 2.Bd5 Kh8 3.Kg6
00:00:02 16.01 0.27 1.Be4
00:00:02 16.01 0.27 1.Be4
00:00:05 17.00 2.69 1.Kg5 Kh7 2.Bd5 Kh8 3.Bf3 Kh7 4.Bd5 Kh8 5.Bf3
00:00:05 17.01 2.69 1.Be4
00:00:05 17.01 2.69 1.Be4
00:00:06 17.01 12.45 1.Be4 Kh8 2.Kf7 g5 3.Bf5 g4 4.Bxg4 Kh7 5.Bf5
Kh6 6.Bg6 Kg5 7.Kg7 Kf4 8.h6
00:00:06 18.00 12.47 1.Be4 Kh8 2.Kf7 g5 3.Bf5 g4 4.Bxg4 Kh7 5.Bf5
Kh6 6.Bg6 Kg5 7.Kg7 Kg4 8.h6 Kf4
00:00:14 19.00 6.82 1.Be4 Kh8 2.Kf7 g5 3.Ke7 g4 4.Ke6 g3 5.Bc2
Kg8 6.Kd6 Kh8 7.Be4 Kg7 8.Ke5 Kh6 9.Ba8 Kh7
10.Bh1 Kg7 11.Kf5 Kh6 12.Kg4 Kg7
00:00:53 20.00 6.44 1.Be4 Kh8 2.Kf7 g5 3.Kg6 g4 4.h6 Kg8 5.Bd5
Kh8 6.Kh5 Kh7 7.Be4 Kg8 8.Kh4 Kh8 9.Kg3 Kg8
10.Kf4 Kh8 11.Kxg4 Kg8 12.Bd3 Kf7
00:03:13 21.00 6.54 1.Be4 Kh8 2.Kf7 g5 3.h6 g4 4.Bf5 g3 5.Ke6 Kg8
6.Bd3 Kh8 7.Kf5 Kg8 8.Be4 Kh8 9.Bd3 Kg8 10.Be4
Kh8
00:10:58 22.00 6.80 1.Be4 Kh8 2.Kf7 g5 3.h6 g4 4.Bd5 g3 5.Kg6 g2
6.Bxg2 Kg8 7.Bc6 Kh8 8.Kf5 Kh7 9.Kg5 Kh8 10.Be4
Kg8 11.Bc6 Kh7 12.Be4 Kg8
00:22:04 23.00 12.76 1.Be4 Kh8 2.Kf7 g5 3.Bc2 g4 4.Ke6 g3 5.h6
Kg8 6.Kd6 g2 7.Ke6 g1 8.Kd5 Kf7 9.h7 Qg7 10.h8
Qxh8 11.Ke4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this variation after 4.Ke6 g3:
[D]7k/8/4K3/7P/8/6p1/2B5/8 w - - 0 5
5.h6 leads to a mate in 26 after 5..g3-g2! volgens Lokasoft's Nalimov server,
5..Kg8 is draw
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
00:36:30 24.00 7.52 1.Be4 Kh8 2.Bc6 Kg8 3.Kf5 Kh7 4.Ke5 Kh6 5.Be8
Kh7 6.Bg6 Kh8 7.Bd3 Kg8 8.Bc4 Kh7 9.Bd3 Kh8
10.Be4 Kg8 11.Kd4 Kf7 12.Bd5 Kf6
Not so bad in relation to the other two versions I think! Experimental is
already in this version
[Eternal Checks = Normal] * Algorithm to detect eternal checks
which is a hidden option in Pro Deo 1.1 and I'm not sure if it works well but
worth a try. No perpetual checks I think in this position but maybe there is an
effect on detecting move repetitions? Don't know..
Now in next version {9k16IQ} I added
[Pruning = MISC_59] * Recalculate Bad Bishop (endgame)
Pro Deo 1.1 Vulcan {9k16IQ}
00:00:00.2 0,00 1 4 Kf5
00:00:00.2 0,02 1 18 Bd5+ Kh8
00:00:00.2 0,02 2 45 Bd5+ Kh8
00:00:00.2 0,01 3 142 Bd5+ Kh8 Bc4
00:00:00.2 0,01 3 192 Be4 Kh8
00:00:00.2 6,17 4 513 Be4 Kf8 Bd5 Ke7 Kxg7
00:00:00.2 6,17 5 681 Be4 Kf8 Bd5 Ke7 Kxg7
00:00:00.2 0,06 6 1690 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g5 Kg6 g4
00:00:00.2 0,14 6 1804 Bd5+ Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf5 Kf7
00:00:00.2 0,16 7 3551 Bd5+ Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf5 Kf7 Ke4
00:00:00.2 0,17 8 6225 Bd5+ Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf5 Kf7 Ke5 Ke7
00:00:00.2 0,14 9 12571 Bd5+ Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf5 Kf7 Ke5 Ke7 Kd4
00:00:00.2 0,14 10 27169 Bd5+ Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf5 Kf7 Ke5 Ke7 Kd5 Kf6
00:00:00.2 0,20 10 45586 Kg5 Kh8 Bd5 Kh7 Bf7 Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kg6 Kf8 Kf5
00:00:00.2 0,19 11 77935 Kg5 Kh7 Be4+ Kg8 Bg6 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Bh7+ Kxh7 Ke6 Kh6 Kd6
Kxh5
00:00:00.3 0,24 12 155612 Kg5 Kh7 Be4+ Kg8 Bg6 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Bh7+ Kxh7 Kg5 Kg8 Kf5
Kf7 Ke5 Ke7 h6 gxh6
00:00:00.4 2,66 13 321490 Kg5 Kh7 Bd5 Kh8 Be4 Kg8 Kg6 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8 Kf5 Kh7 Ke5+
Kg8 Kf5 Kh7 Ke5+ Kg8
00:00:00.8 0,31 14 945461 Kg5 Kh8 Bd5 Kh7 Kf5 Kh6 Bf7 Kh7 Ke4 Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8
00:00:01.2 0,24 15 1787356 Kg5 Kh7 Bg4 Kg8 Kf4 Kh7 Bf5+ Kg8 Bd3 Kh8 Be4 Kg8 Ke5
Kh8 Bd5 Kh7 Ke4 Kh6 Bf7 Kh7 Bg6+ Kh8 Ke5 Kg8
00:00:01.3 0,24 15 1963165 Be4
00:00:01.3 0,24 15 1963169 Be4
00:00:01.5 4,36 15 2269995 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g5 Kf6 g4 Kg5 g3 Kg6 Kg8 Bf3 Kf8 Bd5 Ke7
h6
00:00:01.7 4,36 15 2680319 Bd5+
00:00:01.7 4,36 15 2269995 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g5 Kf6 g4 Kg5 g3 Kg6 Kg8 Bf3 Kf8 Bd5 Ke7
h6
00:00:03.0 2,78 16 5085081 Be4 Kh8 Kg5 Kg8 Bd5+ Kh8 Be4 Kg8 Bd5+ Kh8
00:00:04.7 6,72 17 8367708 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g6 Kxg6 Kg8 h6 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8 Kg5 Kh8 Be4
Kg8 Kf4 Kf7 Kf3
00:00:07.6 6,46 18 14902866 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g6 Kxg6 Kg8 Bd5+ Kh8 Bf3 Kg8 Be4 Kh8 Bf5
Kg8 Bg4 Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Bg4 Kh8
00:00:24.2 0,23 19 50107614 Be4 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 h6 gxh6 Bd5+ Kg7 Ke5 Kg6 Bc4 Kg5 Bf7
h5 Kd4 h4 Bd5 Kg6 Be4+ Kf6 Bf3 Ke6 Bg4+ Kd6
00:00:53.2 6,76 20 107519920 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g5 Bg6 g4 Kf6 Kg8 Kg5 g3 Be4 Kg7 Kf4
Kh6 Kg4 g2 Bxg2 Kh7 Kg5 Kg7 Bd5 Kh7 Bf3 Kh8
00:03:14.6 6,66 21 416466599 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g5 Bg6 g4 Ke6 g3 Kd5 Kg8 Bd3 Kg7 Bc2
Kh6 Bd1 Kg7 Bf3 Kh6 Ke4 Kg7 Kd5 Kh6 Ke4 Kg7
00:09:41.6 6,79 22 1271725768 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g5 h6 g4 Ke6 g3 Kf5 Kg8 Bd5+ Kh7 Kg5
g2 Be4+ Kg8 Bxg2 Kh8 Kf4 Kh7 Kg5 Kh8 Kf4 Kh7
00:15:15.2 6,79 22 2029734059 Bd5+
00:15:18.5 6,79 22 2037016498 Bd5+
00:15:48.6 9,70 22 2096759413 Bd5+ Kh8 Kg5 Kh7 Kf5 Kh6 Bf7 Kh7 Ke4 Kh6 Bg6 Kg5
Be8 Kh6 Ke5 Kh7 Bb5 Kg8 Bc4+ Kh8 Bd5 Kh7 Bf3 Kh6
00:20:34.6 2,67 23 2661781641 Bd5+ Kh8 Kf5 Kh7 h6 gxh6 Ke4 Kg6 Bc4 Kf6 Bd3 Ke6
Bc4+ Kd7 Bb5+ Ke7 Kf3 Kd6 Bd3 h5 Ke4 Kc5 Bf1 h4
00:49:49.7 10,09 24 1840378212 Bd5+ Kh8 Be4 Kg8 Kg5 Kh8 Kf4 Kg8 Ke5 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8
Bc4+ Kh7 Bd5 Kh8 Bf3 Kg8 Bd5+ Kh8 Bf3 Kg8 Bd5+
00:51:02.4 10,09 24 1984343681 Be4
00:51:02.7 10,09 24 1984926513 Be4
00:55:09.9 10,09 24 1984343681 Be4
01:35:00.9 10,01 25 3013424823 Bd5+ Kh8 Kg5 Kh7 Kf4 Kh6 Bf7 Kh7 Ke4 Kh8 Bc4 Kh7
Ke5 g5 Bd3+ Kh6 Bg6 Kg7 Bc2 Kh6 Bd1 Kg7 Bf3 Kf8
01:37:31.6 10,01 25 3308854837 Be4
01:37:35.5 10,01 25 3316370722 Be4
01:49:38.0 12,60 25 442718968 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g5 Kg6 g4 Kg5 g3 Kf4 Kg8 Kxg3 Kg7 Bd5
Kf6 Kf4 Kg7 Bf3 Kh7 Be2 Kh6
The output is differerent! But not totally successful. 2.67 for the position at
plydepth 23 is great and is sustained for a full ply, but then the score goes in
the wrong direction again for ply 24. I see exactly the same in the following
version, so maybe there is a clue there? It maybe pure coincidence but at this
point the nodecounter is also overflowing, Kaj Soderberg I believe reported some
other problems at these depths? Strange..
Occasionally I see a () search which I don't believe I've seen before
Current Move : 02:56 21.00 () Bf3-e4
Next version has one other feature from Ed's arsenal to try:
[Pruning = MISC_79] * Bugfix KBPK Bad Bishop (King Safety)
Unfortunately there are again many false fail highs, but at least there is an
effect to be seen of the switch!
Pro Deo 1.1 Vulcan {9k16IQ2}
00:00:00.1 0,00 1 4 Kf5
00:00:00.1 0,02 1 18 Bd5+ Kf8
00:00:00.2 0,02 2 45 Bd5+ Kf8
00:00:00.2 0,01 3 172 Bd5+ Kh8 Bc4
00:00:00.2 0,01 3 218 Be4 Kf8
00:00:00.2 0,02 4 491 Be4 Kf8 Kh7 Kf7
00:00:00.2 0,16 5 806 Be4 Kf8 Bd5 Ke7 Kxg7
00:00:00.2 0,06 6 2289 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g5 Kg6 g4
00:00:00.2 0,06 7 6391 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g5 Kg6 g4 Kg5
00:00:00.2 0,16 7 8840 Bd5+ Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf5 Kf7 Ke4
00:00:00.2 0,17 8 10576 Bd5+ Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf5 Kf7 Ke5 Ke7
00:00:00.2 0,14 9 18305 Bd5+ Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf5 Kf7 Ke5 Ke7 Kd4
00:00:00.2 0,14 10 34988 Bd5+ Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf5 Kf7 Ke5 Ke7 Kd5 Kf6
00:00:00.2 0,14 10 40958 Kg5
00:00:00.2 0,14 10 40965 Kg5
00:00:00.2 5,75 10 51399 Kg5 Kh7 Bd5 g6 hxg6+ Kg7 Be4 Kf8 Kf6
00:00:00.2 5,75 10 53112 Be4
00:00:00.2 5,75 10 51399 Kg5 Kh7 Bd5 g6 hxg6+ Kg7 Be4 Kf8 Kf6
00:00:00.3 0,22 11 137878 Kg5 Kh7 Bd5 Kh8 Bc4 Kh7 Bg8+ Kxg8 Kg6 Kf8 Kg5 Ke7
00:00:00.4 0,17 12 255269 Kg5 Kh8 Bd5 Kh7 Be6 Kh8 Bg8 Kxg8 Kf4 Kf7 Ke5 Ke7 h6
gxh6 Kd4
00:00:00.5 0,14 13 518995 Kg5 Kh7 Bd5 Kh8 Bc4 Kh7 Bg8+ Kxg8 Kf4 Kf7 Ke5 Ke7 Kd5
Kf6 h6
00:00:00.8 0,22 14 1050660 Kg5 Kh7 Bd5 Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Bd5 Kh8 Bf3
00:00:00.8 0,22 14 1078721 Be4
00:00:00.8 0,22 14 1078725 Be4
00:00:00.9 6,71 14 1159350 Be4 Kh8 Kg5 Kg8 Bf5 Kf7 Bd3 Kg8 Kg6 Kh8 Kg5 Kg8 Kg6
Kh8 Kg5
00:00:01.8 0,23 15 2888855 Be4 Kh8 Kg5 Kg8 Bf3 Kh7 Bd5 Kh8 Kf4 Kh7 Bc4 Kh6 Be2
Kh7 Bd3+ Kg8 Be4 Kf7 Kf5 Kg8 Bf3 Kh7 Ke4 Kh6
00:00:02.5 4,66 15 4068126 Bc6 Kh8 Be4 Kg8 Kf5 Kh7 Kg4+ Kg8 Kg5 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8 Kg6
Kh8 Be4 Kg8 Kf5 Kh7 Kg4+ Kg8 Kg5 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8
00:00:03.5 5,30 16 6074050 Bc6 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Bd5+ Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Kg5 g6 hxg6+ Kg7 Kf5
Kh6 Be4 Kg7 Bd5 Kh6 Kf6 Kh5 Bc6 Kg4 Be4 Kf4
00:00:03.6 5,30 16 6098016 Be4
00:00:03.8 5,30 16 6074050 Bc6 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Bd5+ Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Kg5 g6 hxg6+ Kg7 Kf5
Kh6 Be4 Kg7 Bd5 Kh6 Kf6 Kh5 Bc6 Kg4 Be4 Kf4
00:00:06.9 6,60 17 12601023 Bc6 Kh8 Kf7 Kh7 Be4+ Kh8 Ke6 Kg8 Kf5 Kh7 Kf4+ Kg8
Bd3 Kf7 Kg5 Kg8 Bc4+ Kh8 Kf4 Kh7 Bd3+ Kg8 Bb5 Kh7
00:00:09.8 6,60 17 18555737 Bg2
00:00:09.8 6,60 17 12601023 Bc6 Kh8 Kf7 Kh7 Be4+ Kh8 Ke6 Kg8 Kf5 Kh7 Kf4+ Kg8
Bd3 Kf7 Kg5 Kg8 Bc4+ Kh8 Kf4 Kh7 Bd3+ Kg8 Bb5 Kh7
00:00:10.1 6,60 17 19147880 Bh1
00:00:10.1 6,60 17 19191429 Bh1
00:00:10.1 6,60 17 19147880 Bh1
00:00:15.7 4,83 18 29843466 Bc6 Kh8 Kg5 Kh7 Kf4 Kh6 Be8 Kh7 Bg6+ Kh8 Bf7 Kh7 Kg5
Kh8 Kf4 Kh7 Kg5 Kh8
00:00:16.7 4,83 18 31907503 Be4
00:00:16.7 4,83 18 31908041 Be4
00:00:17.3 9,89 18 33050701 Be4 Kh8 Kf7 g6 Kxg6 Kg8 Kg5 Kg7 h6+ Kg8 Kf4 Kf7 Kg4
Kf6 Bd3 Kf7 h7 Kg7 Kg5 Kh8 Be4 Kg7 Bg6 Kh8
00:00:32.8 0,23 19 63275785 Be4 Kh8 Kf5 Kh7 Ke5+ Kg8 h6 gxh6 Bd5+ Kg7 Be4 h5 Bf5
h4 Be6 Kg6 Ke4 Kg5 Bc4 Kg6 Be6 Kg5 Bc4 Kg6
00:01:13.1 5,19 20 143456790 Be4 Kh8 Kg5 Kg8 Bh7+ Kxh7 h6 gxh6+ Kf4 Kg6 Kg4 Kf6
Kf3 h5 Ke4 h4 Kf4 Ke6 Kg4 h3 Kxh3
00:02:21.5 5,19 20 288717205 Bb7
00:02:23.6 5,19 20 143456790 Be4 Kh8 Kg5 Kg8 Bh7+ Kxh7 h6 gxh6+ Kf4 Kg6 Kg4 Kf6
Kf3 h5 Ke4 h4 Kf4 Ke6 Kg4 h3 Kxh3
00:02:31.2 5,19 20 309184458 Be2
00:02:36.9 5,23 20 321392222 Be2 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8 Kg5 Kh8 Kf4 Kg8 Ke5 Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Be4
Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Be4 Kh8
00:03:05.5 5,40 21 381101005 Be2 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8 Kf5 Kh7 Ke4 Kh6 Be2 Kg5 Bf3 Kf6 Kd5
Kg5 Kd4 Kh6 Ke3 Kg5 Kd4 Kh6 Ke3 Kg5
00:03:13.8 5,40 21 398645293 Be4
00:03:36.6 5,40 21 381101005 Be2 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8 Kf5 Kh7 Ke4 Kh6 Be2 Kg5 Bf3 Kf6 Kd5
Kg5 Kd4 Kh6 Ke3 Kg5 Kd4 Kh6 Ke3 Kg5
00:05:04.3 5,40 21 631584531 Kf5
00:06:21.6 5,40 21 381101005 Be2 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8 Kf5 Kh7 Ke4 Kh6 Be2 Kg5 Bf3 Kf6 Kd5
Kg5 Kd4 Kh6 Ke3 Kg5 Kd4 Kh6 Ke3 Kg5
00:13:10.7 5,32 22 1642030902 Be2 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Ke4 Kh7 Ke5 Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Be4+ Kh8
Bf5 Kg8 Be4 Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Be4
00:14:21.9 5,32 22 1791754410 Kf5
00:18:33.3 5,32 22 1642030902 Be2 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Ke4 Kh7 Ke5 Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Be4+ Kh8
Bf5 Kg8 Be4 Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Be4
00:19:58.5 5,32 22 2487993519 Kg5
00:23:13.2 5,32 22 1642030902 Be2 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Ke4 Kh7 Ke5 Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Be4+ Kh8
Bf5 Kg8 Be4 Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Be4
00:24:09.5 5,32 22 2982092492 Be4
00:25:17.3 5,32 22 1642030902 Be2 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Ke4 Kh7 Ke5 Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Be4+ Kh8
Bf5 Kg8 Be4 Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Be4
00:25:45.9 5,32 22 3178054058 Bb7
00:25:54.8 5,32 22 1642030902 Be2 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Ke4 Kh7 Ke5 Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Be4+ Kh8
Bf5 Kg8 Be4 Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Be4
00:29:30.6 5,32 22 3627929785 Ba8
00:29:42.4 5,32 22 1642030902 Be2 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Ke4 Kh7 Ke5 Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Be4+ Kh8
Bf5 Kg8 Be4 Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Be4
00:30:41.2 5,32 22 3775314934 Bd1
00:31:03.1 5,32 22 1642030902 Be2 Kh8 Kf5 Kg8 Ke4 Kh7 Ke5 Kh8 Bf3 Kh7 Be4+ Kh8
Bf5 Kg8 Be4 Kh8 Bf5 Kg8 Be4
00:37:45.9 2,45 23 302081169 Be2 Kh8 Kf5 Kh7 Bf3 Kg8 Bd5+ Kh7 Kf4 g5+ Kxg5 Kg7
Be4 Kf7 h6 Kg8 Bd5+ Kh7 Bc4 Kh8 Bd3 Kg8 Be4 Kh8
01:26:57.4 5,00 24 1822254505 Be2 Kh8 Kf7 Kh7 Ke7 Kh6 Kf8 Kh7 Kf7 Kh8 Ke7 Kh7
Kd6 Kh6 Kc7 Kg5 Kb8 Kf4 Kc7 Ke3 Bc4
01:40:08.4 5,00 24 3475586626 Kf5
02:17:34.9 5,00 24 1822254505 Be2 Kh8 Kf7 Kh7 Ke7 Kh6 Kf8 Kh7 Kf7 Kh8 Ke7 Kh7
Kd6 Kh6 Kc7 Kg5 Kb8 Kf4 Kc7 Ke3 Bc4
02:24:27.3 5,00 24 455406367 Kg5
02:45:31.9 5,00 24 1822254505 Be2 Kh8 Kf7 Kh7 Ke7 Kh6 Kf8 Kh7 Kf7 Kh8 Ke7 Kh7
Kd6 Kh6 Kc7 Kg5 Kb8 Kf4 Kc7 Ke3 Bc4
I think I would still prefer version 1! Maybe Ed can make some sense of this?
Eelco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.