Author: Harald Faber
Date: 03:44:01 03/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 1999 at 06:08:27, blass uri wrote: >>>>Uri, wins are always based on opponent's mistakes. If noone would make mistakes, >>>>chess would, like predicted, have ended in draw games. >>>>So why complaining a lucky win when every win is lucky in that definition. >>> >>>The point is that Deep thought did not do a typical computer mistake but a >>>mistake that other programs do not do. >>> >>>Uri >> >>No point because other computers make other mistakes. > >I looked in the games of kasparov against the same deep thought and kasparov won >convincingly. > >Kasparov took advantage of typical computer mistakes when karpov won only >because of a mistake that he could not know before the game that deep thought >would do. But Karpov plays on to check if the program really does no mistake. >I think that kasparov is better than karpov in playing anti-computer chess. >Uri Maybe, or probably only if he has enough data to find out the programs weakness(es). I bet he'd have wondered what Hiarcs e.g. would have played because once he thought computer program=Fritz...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.