Author: blass uri
Date: 04:44:35 03/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 1999 at 03:20:46, Harald Faber wrote: >On March 03, 1999 at 12:11:46, Shaun Brewer wrote: > >>>>What level of confidence can be attached to computer tournaments that the winner >>>>is the best? >>> >>>Define "best" and you get the answer. >> >>Probably the most that can be hoped for is strongest in terms of the field of >>opponents. > >I split "best/srtongest" into 3 terms: >1) best in play comp-comp >2) best in play comp-human >3) best in play correspondence (where certainly knowledge-based programs have >advantage) I am not sure what is knowledge-based programs. Is Hiarcs7 a knowledge based program? I know that Hiarcs7 has better results in blitz relative to 40/40 games against Junior5 in Enrique's games so I have no evidence that it is better than Junior for correspondence games. I think it is important to know to prune unimportant lines and to extend the important lines for correspondence games. I did not decide with which program to play in the 3/4 final of Israel in correspondence games. It may be a good poll question. There is a good chance that I will play with Junior because I can get the last version of Junior from Amir but I did not decide about it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.