Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: An Experiment that disproves Hyatt's 1000X NPS Theory

Author: Peter Kappler

Date: 14:08:45 09/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On September 20, 2005 at 16:20:54, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>You are confusing chess with gambling. In short: all these results from human
>tournaments, where a single computer program is participating, are nonsense
>because the humans cant adapt to the specific computerchess requirements. You
>cannot play a computer with your "normal" human chess if you are not a super GM.
>Anticomputerchess is a MUST to do. But that must be trained. It makes no sense
>to play a single computer in a human round robin tournament. All this is trivial
>and therefore the results are insignificant.

Anticomputer chess is a myth.  For every game you show me where a human
succeeded with an "anticomputer" strategy, I will show you 10 more where the
same strategy failed miserably.

-Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.