Author: Harald Faber
Date: 06:47:30 03/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 1999 at 07:44:35, blass uri wrote: >>>>>What level of confidence can be attached to computer tournaments that the winner >>>>>is the best? >>>> >>>>Define "best" and you get the answer. >>> >>>Probably the most that can be hoped for is strongest in terms of the field of >>>opponents. >> >>I split "best/srtongest" into 3 terms: >>1) best in play comp-comp >>2) best in play comp-human >>3) best in play correspondence (where certainly knowledge-based programs have >>advantage) > >I am not sure what is knowledge-based programs. >Is Hiarcs7 a knowledge based program? That was a rhetoric question. Of course it is. >I know that Hiarcs7 has better results in blitz relative to 40/40 games against >Junior5 in Enrique's games so I have no evidence that it is better than Junior >for correspondence games. Try it out. :-) >I did not decide with which program to play in the 3/4 final of Israel in >correspondence games. Why not take MCP in the correspondence mode? >It may be a good poll question. Ask Steve. :-) >There is a good chance that I will play with Junior because I can get the last >version of Junior from Amir but I did not decide about it. >Uri What about Shredder, it is said to be strategic OK too.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.