Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 02:58:47 09/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2005 at 05:45:45, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On September 21, 2005 at 05:30:06, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On September 21, 2005 at 05:22:56, Graham Banks wrote:
>>
>>>Round One Matches (after Game 6 of 30)
>>>(2.5-3.5) Fruit WCCC'05 v Spike 1.0 Mainz
>>
>> Hi Graham
>> A somewhat surprising result so far. And furthermore,
>> I am wondering how many testers have already received
>> Fruit WCCC'05 before this engine is being made
>> commercially available -:)
>> Best regards
>> Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com]
>
>I am NOT surprise at all, Spike 1.0 Mainz is NOT much weaker than Fruit, at
>least with the tests that I have done so far. You can say that Fruit might be
>slightly better, but not by much.
>
>Jorge
Hi Jorge
Due to our own tests and results of many other
testers we would tend to say that Fruit 2.1 is
most probably stronger than Spike 1.0a Mainz,
of course without considering FRC
Spike Test (40'/40)
http://www.utzingerk.com/spike10a_test.htm
Fruit 2.1 Test
http://www.utzingerk.com/fruit21_test.htm
CEGT 40'/40 Test
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rangliste.html
CEGT and AEGT Test
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/acegt.html
CEGT Blitz Rating
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitz.html
Kind regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.