Author: Rick Hagen
Date: 01:09:20 09/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2005 at 02:51:23, Graham Banks wrote: >On September 22, 2005 at 01:45:59, Henrik Dinesen wrote: > >>Hi Rick, >> >>What I don't understand is the eventdate. >>Well, and it seems to be a very, very early version "10". >> >>Regards >>Henrik > >I don't actually think it's a Hiarcs 10 beta. I suspect the user is just >experimenting with the Hiarcs 9 settings. I could well be wrong though :-) > >Graham. Hi Graham, The "hiarcs-beta tester" posted some of his games here, I believe. It deviates from regular Hiarcs 9 in more ways than could be achieved by tuning. Its selectivity is higher, higher than can be achieved by tuning alone. Also the updated info on the Hiarcs page about Hiarcs 10 gives me the benefit of the doubt this is indeed a beta version. Sorry to have posted a loss, and not a win... which -looking at its accumulated elo- are in greater number than its losses. But I too could be wrong of course... Regards, Rick
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.