Author: Henrik Dinesen
Date: 02:21:46 09/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2005 at 04:09:20, Rick Hagen wrote: >On September 22, 2005 at 02:51:23, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On September 22, 2005 at 01:45:59, Henrik Dinesen wrote: >> >>>Hi Rick, >>> >>>What I don't understand is the eventdate. >>>Well, and it seems to be a very, very early version "10". >>> >>>Regards >>>Henrik >> >>I don't actually think it's a Hiarcs 10 beta. I suspect the user is just >>experimenting with the Hiarcs 9 settings. I could well be wrong though :-) >> >>Graham. > >Hi Graham, > >The "hiarcs-beta tester" posted some of his games here, I believe. >It deviates from regular Hiarcs 9 in more ways than could be achieved by tuning. >Its selectivity is higher, higher than can be achieved by tuning alone. >Also the updated info on the Hiarcs page about Hiarcs 10 gives me the benefit of >the doubt this is indeed a beta version. >Sorry to have posted a loss, and not a win... which -looking at its accumulated >elo- are in greater number than its losses. > >But I too could be wrong of course... > >Regards, >Rick Ok, this all makes some sense. Not exactly a beta of "10", but... :) Pre-Beta Regards Henrik
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.