Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:58:33 09/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 23, 2005 at 10:49:43, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On September 23, 2005 at 07:40:16, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >>Hello Kurt, >> >>I am really sad becouse I have won easy to Fritz 9. >> >>I was thinking that was not possible for me to beat Fritz 9 Fritz. >> >>An engine that is beating so easy has a real serious problem. >> >>For example, if Zappa 2.0b will be losing games against that easy stone wall, >>now, Zappa 2.0b wont be a real strong engine. >> >>Same opinion about each engine that will be losing gainst me. >> >>For that reason an engine like Comp Quark is the best for me. >> >>Look ...... When an strong Dragon could ne destroy with a little finger, the >>Dragon change for a little pet. >> >> >>Best, >> >>Pablo > > Hi Pablo > You have not won the game. Black (Fritz 9) had > an advantage of material but exceeded the time > for the well-known reasons (no increment time). > Had you not promised to play "normal chess" in > future and to demonstrate your strength in this way? > Best regards > Kurt Fritz9 had an advantage of material because pablo sacrificed material when he saw that Fritz9 is going to lose on time. Chessbase claimed that Fritz9 is going to be better against humans and the game proved that this claim was a joke. The game proves that Fritz9 is stupid like other programs and evaluated a closed position with equal material as +2 pawns for itself inspite of having no plan. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.