Author: Peter Eizenhammer
Date: 07:00:51 09/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2005 at 05:05:27, Sandro Necchi wrote: >Hi, >for those people who enjoy to test new settings, here there is a new one which >looks fun and maybe even better than Columbus' egg...it has not been tested yet, >but you can do it...if you want: >Columbus' egg 9a >by Sandro Necchi > Hi Sandro, why do you think your setting is better if you have not tested it? The idea to increase the interest in Shredder is understandable, and it deserves any interest, cause it is an excellent software, of course. From my own testing of settings I know, too, that many esp. small changes dont change the overall strength too much, or to say it in an different way: You have to work hard to hurt Shredder's outstanding strength ;-) But I really cannot see the point, why you publish this setting, and not any other of several thousand possible settings with presumably still acceptable performance. Peter
This page took 0.42 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.