Author: J.Dufek
Date: 08:34:35 09/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
Why? Rxe6 is solution, where is a problem? On September 24, 2005 at 18:28:36, Frank Wies wrote: >On September 24, 2005 at 18:15:20, Marek Soszynski wrote: > >>On September 24, 2005 at 16:47:30, Frank Wies wrote: >> >>>I guess not. I set the machine to search to 20 ply. I will set it at a high >>>search depth and send you the results. >> >>Deep Shredder 9 >> >> 9/24 0:01 +0.05 1.Rc7 Qxh6 2.Qf6 Rb8 (525.367) 386 >> 10/23 0:01 +0.05 1.Rc7 Qxh6 2.Qf6 Qf8 3.Rxe6 fxe6 (645.880) 390 >> 11/22 0:02 +0.05 1.Rc7 Qxh6 2.Qf6 Qf8 3.Rxe6 fxe6 (918.696) 397 >> 12/31 0:03 +0.09 1.Rc7 Qxh6 2.Rxe6 fxe6 3.Qf6 Qf8 4.Qxe6+ Kh8 5.Qe5+ Kg8 >>6.Bh3 (1.594.450) 414 >> 13/26 0:05 +0.09 1.Rc7 Qxh6 2.Rxe6 fxe6 3.Qf6 Qf8 4.Qxe6+ Kh8 5.Qe5+ Kg8 >>6.Bh3 Ra6 7.Be6+ (2.355.015) 420 >> 14/37 0:10 +0.34++ 1.Rc7 Qxh6 (4.261.355) 408 >> 14/37 0:15 +0.34 1.Rc7 Ra6 (6.306.134) 412 >> 14/38 0:17 +0.35++ 1.Rxe6 (7.235.490) 416 >> 14/40 0:18 +0.70++ 1.Rxe6 (7.583.853) 419 >> 14/40 0:53 +5.25 1.Rxe6 Ra7 2.Re5 Rda8 3.Rcxd5 (22.554.013) 421 >> 15/37 1:06 +5.29 1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Rc7 Qxh6 3.Qf6 Rf3 4.Qxd8+ Rf8 5.Qd7 g5 >>6.Bxb5 Ra8 7.Rc8+ Rxc8 8.Qxc8+ Kg7 9.Qd7+ Kf6 (27.838.247) 420 >> 16/42 1:34 +5.49 1.Rxe6 Ra7 2.Re5 Raa8 3.Rcxd5 Rxd5 4.Rxd5 Qxh6 5.Rd8+ Rxd8 >>6.Qxd8+ Kg7 7.Bxb5 Qc1+ 8.Bf1 Qb1 (40.356.117) 426 >> 17/45 2:34 +5.69 1.Rxe6 Qxh6 2.Rxd5 Rf8 3.Re7 Raa8 4.Rxb5 Qc1 5.Rbb7 Ra1 >>6.Qd3 Qh6 7.Kg2 (66.133.637) 427 > >I have been running the same test for the last 95 minutes and 9.3B notes later, >Deep Shredder 9 X64 has not come up with anything but Rxe6 with a progression >from + 5.60 to + 6.78! Search Depth set a 30 plies. > >Tough problem for this program. I will let it run until (if it can) complete the >30 ply search. > >Regards, >Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.