Author: Marc Lacrosse
Date: 22:56:02 09/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 2005 at 21:02:07, A. Cozzie wrote:
>On September 25, 2005 at 07:51:02, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>On September 24, 2005 at 20:00:25, Harvey Williamson wrote:
>>
>>>This game shows the exciting playing style of the new Hiarcs X:
>>>
>>>[Event "60m + 15s, rated"]
>>>[Site "?"]
>>>[Date "2005.09.23"]
>>>[Round "?"]
>>>[White "Mantilla, Hiarcs 9.0608"]
>>>[Black "Adept, TheKing333rs1d S"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>[ECO "D19"]
>>>[WhiteElo "2449"]
>>>[BlackElo "2364"]
>>>[Annotator "Hiarcs 9.0608 (180s)"]
>>>[PlyCount "75"]
>>>[EventDate "2005.09.23"]
>>>[EventType "rapid"]
...
> 38. Ne6 {Adept,TheKing333rs1d S
>>>resigns (Lag: Av=0.19s, max=0.6s) [%eval 594,15] [%emt 0:00:00]} (38. Ne6 Qg8
>>>39. Qf5 $18) 1-0
>>
>>Your comments are superficial IMHO. 24.b4 followed by 25.Qh5 was not good at
>>all.
...
>>Michael
>
>You don't have to be quite so harsh. After all, its impossible to win unless
>your opponent makes a mistake.
>
>Actually, I think this game is a great example of why Fruit is such a commercial
>killer. They have all jacked their kingsafety values so high (because then they
>slaughter amateur programs) that Fruit just takes the piece and wins.
>
>anthony
What is the point of commenting a Hiarcs-TheKing game with reference to Fruit ?
Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.