Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: WIN is WIN (NT)

Author: Jonas Cohonas

Date: 09:02:01 09/26/05

Go up one level in this thread

>On September 26, 2005 at 11:00:56, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>
>>Let me guess, these "wins" were on time?

But it says _very_ little about strength and has no value in terms of usability.
And the most pathetic thing about these games is that server lag is probably the
most likely reason as to why these engines lose on time!

If i play a 1200 rated player over 100 games i would probably win them all, but
what's fun and fair about that? oh yeah that's right "a win is a win" so i
should be proud...

Regards
Jonas

• Re: WIN is WIN (NT) Uri Blass 10:12:53 09/26/05
  • Sound advice Thomas Black 11:07:38 09/26/05
  • Re: WIN is WIN (NT) Jonas Cohonas 10:38:02 09/26/05
    • Re: WIN is WIN (NT) Uri Blass 11:07:37 09/26/05
• Sigh! robert flesher 09:08:36 09/26/05
  • Please elaborate on that :) Jonas Cohonas 09:22:48 09/26/05
    • Re: Please elaborate on that :) robert flesher 10:59:10 09/26/05
      • Re: Please elaborate on that :) Jonas Cohonas 11:40:12 09/26/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.