Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 13:08:04 09/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2005 at 14:51:56, Ray Banks wrote:
>OK, you haven't heard from me for a while, because I've been adding Fruit 2.1
>into the tables which has taken quite a while. Anyway, the link below shows a
>cross-table of my testing results. CELL is still on top
>
>http://www.tuvoc.plus.com/CM10th.htm
>
>You can see that I tested CM10th default as a baseline, and also CM9000 Slayer
>which was the best of the CM9000 personalities I tested.
>All tested CM10th settings are better than the default, and note also that
>CM9000 Slayer is also stronger than CM10th Default.
>
>This has been a mammoth task, and is not finished yet. Graham has advised I
>should now test:
>
>Scorpion
>WoDra
>Pestilence
>Behemoth II
>Milan 2.6
>SoFar3
>
>Not sure if I'll get that far as I have less machines now devoted to this. And I
>reckon CELL will not be toppled from number 1.
>
>CM fans, enjoy !!
>
>P.S. Let me know if the link doesn't work....
Hi Ray
The link works fine. Do I understand your list
correctly: CM10k default had the best result
with 16.0 (out of how many games??) vs Shredder 9?
BTW: Thank you for your testing.
Best regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.