Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Some vindications concerning the activation-constraint of Fruit

Author: Christos Gitsis

Date: 16:18:32 09/26/05

Go up one level in this thread


On September 26, 2005 at 18:58:45, Alex Newman wrote:

>Hi Joachim,
>
>That's all fine and well, but I still think you are making a mistake.
>People who use pirated software will NEVER buy Fruit. Why would they? They are
>used to the free stuff. They already got Shredder, Fritz,... for free.
>Fritz 9 which seems to be very strong is already available on all peer-to-peer
>networks.
>Most of those people will just wait a while until the copy-protection is broken
>by some hacker. Since Fruit's exe is very small, I expect that it's going to be
>extremly easy for many to brake it. Your only hope is that since Fruit is not
>well known outside the small CC comunity, they may never find out about it.
>
>In the meantime, you are making a big inconvenience for your good customers. In
>my oppinion, you will hurt sales rather then gain some.
>
>Alex

Just because some people might break the copy protection, this does not mean
that the author should not make it difficult for them.

How does a creator feel, when he sees the fruit of his work being stolen,
knowing that he did not do his best to prevent this?

If I were an program author I would try to protect my product in every way that
I could.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.