Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:44:38 09/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2005 at 20:23:23, Andres Valverde wrote: >On September 26, 2005 at 20:00:56, Dann Corbit wrote: > > >>I would use pm (predicted move) unless there is a move that your engine cannot >>calculate and you know to be superior -- in that case use bm. > >Yes, pm seems accurate > >> And also I would >>suggest standard EPD records. Separate segments with semicolons and lose the >>non-standard colons. > >oops., I read badly the EPD standard > >>I also think SAN is better than coordinate, but to each his tastes. > >Thanks a lot Out of curiosity, do you have this position in your book, and if so, what is the evaluation you have attached to it: [D]r1bqk1nr/pppp1ppp/2n5/b7/2BpP3/2P2N2/P4PPP/RNBQ1RK1 b kq - am dxc3; bm Nge7;
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.