Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Some vindications concerning the activation-constraint of Fruit

Author: gerold daniels

Date: 18:57:10 09/26/05

Go up one level in this thread


On September 26, 2005 at 19:57:47, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On September 26, 2005 at 19:51:35, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On September 26, 2005 at 19:36:31, David Dahlem wrote:
>>
>>>On September 26, 2005 at 18:14:29, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 26, 2005 at 17:46:28, Roger Brown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On September 26, 2005 at 16:47:09, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>At some point, I think you will have to change your method of protection.
>>>>>>Consider if you sell 100,000 copies some day in total volume.  For sure, every 5
>>>>>>years almost all of those machines will change.  Now, imagine handling the email
>>>>>>traffic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But while your volume is still low, I think that method will probably work fine.
>>>>>> It won't prevent me from buying a copy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Hello Dann,
>>>>>
>>>>>Needless to say, I am sure that they would love to have that problem.
>>>>
>>>>It sounds like a good problem to have, but imagine (if you will 50,000 emails).
>>>>Somebody has to read them.  Somebody has to understand them and process those
>>>>requests.  Calculate how many that is per year.  Think of how many you could
>>>>process in one hour.  You will quickly see that the $35 chess engine is costing
>>>>them a few hundred dollars for each one that they sell.  Now, the problem is not
>>>>nearly so much fun.
>>>>
>>>>>I would love to have that problem.
>>>>
>>>>I suspect it would not be as enjoyable as you might imagine.
>>>>
>>>>>Darn, I would love to be able to write a chess program of any strength.
>>>>
>>>>If you wanted to spend the time and effort, you could do it.  But it's like Van
>>>>Cliburn (the famous pianist).  A lady walked up to him one day and said:
>>>>"I would give anything to play like you!"
>>>>
>>>>"No you wouldn't" Van Cliburn responded.
>>>>
>>>>"Yes I would!" she came back again.
>>>>
>>>>"You wouldn't give 4 hours per day practicing, every day without exception, for
>>>>25 years." was his final reply.
>>>>
>>>>>Later.
>>>
>>>If she really enjoyed playing and practicing, 4 hours per day is nothing. :-)
>
>Maybe that is part of it.  I took trumpet for 4 years and practiced 45 minutes a
>day.  Some days, I just couldn't make myself do it, although I enjoyed playing.
>Other times, I would be sick of it after 15 minutes.  There is no way I would
>have been able to stomach 4 hours a day, every day. Maybe piano is different.
>
>>>Regards
>>>Dave
>>
>>Even if she had the talent, it would take more than 4 hours a day, though she'd
>>know well before 25 years had passed.
>
>She might know, but to be a real virtuosso, she would probably have to put in
>the years.  There is a big difference (I think) between playing a note perfectly
>and playing it perfectly with showing your true feeling at the same time.
>
>Lots of people can play all the notes on a guitar.  But how many of them can
>make me know what they are feeling like George Benson?
>
>>                                        Albert
>
>Delta Romeo Charlie

Its a little diff. if you enjoy playing and playing in a small band. Time flys
then.

THE Blues,

Gerold.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.