Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 22:08:30 09/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2005 at 19:23:37, Thomas Logan wrote: >On September 26, 2005 at 17:26:59, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On September 26, 2005 at 17:11:29, Thomas Logan wrote: >> >>>On September 26, 2005 at 14:22:51, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>even if it is not exactly what is was looking for it is close to it and fun and >>>>strong...I think the strongest setting for Shredder 9...you can check it >>>>yourself. >>>> >>>> >>>>Columbus' egg 9b >>>> >>>>by Sandro Necchi >>>> >>>>Queen = 99 >>>>100 >>>>Rook = 99 >>>>100 >>>>Bishop = 98 >>>>100 >>>>Knight = 99 >>>>100 >>>>Pawn = 100 >>>>100 >>>>Style = intelligent >>>>Combinations = All >>>>Forward pruning = 3 >>>>Selectivity = -1 >>>>Draw score = -15 >>>>King safety = 119 >>>>Center control = 104 >>>>Pawn structure = 102 >>>>102 >>>>Passed pawns = 102 >>>>102 >>>>Bishop pair = 101 >>>>100 >>>>Time usage = 100 >>>>Kknowledge or speed = 100 >>>>Threads = 1 >>>> >>>>Have fun! >>>> >>>>Sandro >>> >>>Whats with the draw score >>> >>>9b has -15 >>> >>>9a has + 65 >>> >>>please explain >>> >>>Tom >> >>The new draw score is -15 (minus 15)...this would show a more positive score >>than the 9a (with draw score = 65) and probably more realistic in prospective >>too... > >Hello Sandro Hi, > >I guess I am confused about the meaning of the draw score plus verses a minus > >one refers to a position that is ahead the other to a position that is behind > >Why take a draw in a position you are ahead well, I found out that the program evaluation is somehow effected by the draw score and therefore I used this to show a little different evaluation score...many games are draw up to -+ 85 so this does not change the program evaluation to a draw score only... > > >> >>this setting is eating Shredder 9 Eccentric (41 games 24.5 to 16.5 at 15 minutes >each) and playing very aggressive too. > >I will give it a test after Eccentric-Toga is finished OK. Sandro > >Tom > >> >>Still Shredder 9 Eccentric is a solid setting so I must congratulate with Dr. >>Wael Deeb, but this setting is stronger in my testing and very strong... >> >>not sure I can improve it further... >> >>Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.