Author: Alex
Date: 22:43:28 09/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2005 at 00:42:23, John Merlino wrote: >On September 27, 2005 at 00:17:40, ERIQ wrote: > >>Hi all I just purchased a copy of Majestic chess and after looking at it again I >>could help but think of a few ways to make it better. >> >>1. add ability to play uci engines in interface >>2. add ability to play on ICC >>3. add engine vs. engine match ability >>4. add time to depth in eval plus save/export games in pgn. >>5. add ability to eval your games both forward and/or backward and add pretty >>girl voice saying nice things :) >> >>yep, that would do it for me. New worth of interface *priceless* > >This is nice and all, but Vivendi killed the development of the Majestic Chess >line two years ago, and stopped supporting it a few months ago. > >jm I for one am VERY sorry to hear that.............. It was very entertaining and /..DIFFERENT. I disagree with the above suggested "improvement". I don't want a (relatively speaking) chessbase clone..... I WANT new and Different! Thye W chess engine I have ALways been a big fan! Programs of suc nature are for (PRIMARILY speking) for entertainment. If I want the latest and greatest PROFESIONAL system of chess ..ok it is thus far ches base. No. MJ is an entertainment program wiht kewl GRPHICS and a PLEASNAT diversion from TOURNAMNET programs where I can park my mind and --INDEED--get motivated to play 'REGULAR CHESS ' Again!! NUFF SAID THE ALEX
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.