Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:36:38 09/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2005 at 03:22:11, Alex Shalamanov wrote: >On September 27, 2005 at 02:41:20, Bernhard Bauer wrote: > >> >>So you believed that Fruit was better than Zappa? >>Nice. >> >>kind regards >>Bernhard > >So you REALLY believe Zappa to be the strongest on a single processor hardware? >Lol! Weren't it for the hardware, there wouldn't be so much ado about Zappa. >It's my view, though. >As to Fritz 9, I've checked the games it played online but wasn't impressed with >them any bit. Okay, there's some evaluation progress visible compared to Fritz >Bilbao but nothing much to be declared as the "the major breakthrough". I guess, >Fruit (even 2.1) plays better chess at longer time controls than Fritz. Again, >nothing personal. > >Best wishes, >Alexander I guess that you consider 40/40 on 2 ghz as short time control because Fritz9 is leading the list: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ranglisteall.html Note that I am not impressed by evaluation of Fritz9 based on looking at games of Pablo against it and it cannot win games inspite of evaluation of more than +4 during the game see http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?451775 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.