Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 06:42:10 09/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2005 at 03:36:38, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 27, 2005 at 03:22:11, Alex Shalamanov wrote: > >>On September 27, 2005 at 02:41:20, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >> >>> >>>So you believed that Fruit was better than Zappa? >>>Nice. >>> >>>kind regards >>>Bernhard >> >>So you REALLY believe Zappa to be the strongest on a single processor hardware? >>Lol! Weren't it for the hardware, there wouldn't be so much ado about Zappa. >>It's my view, though. >>As to Fritz 9, I've checked the games it played online but wasn't impressed with >>them any bit. Okay, there's some evaluation progress visible compared to Fritz >>Bilbao but nothing much to be declared as the "the major breakthrough". I guess, >>Fruit (even 2.1) plays better chess at longer time controls than Fritz. Again, >>nothing personal. >> >>Best wishes, >>Alexander > >I guess that you consider 40/40 on 2 ghz as short time control because Fritz9 is >leading the list: > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ranglisteall.html > >Note that I am not impressed by evaluation of Fritz9 based on looking at games >of Pablo against it and it cannot win games inspite of evaluation of more than >+4 during the game That can happen to anyone... Shredder is known to among the top engines, if not the best, in the world. And it normally has a very optimistic evaluation of its position. Torstein > >see http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?451775 > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.