Author: Andres Valverde
Date: 14:49:34 09/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2005 at 16:54:13, Dann Corbit wrote: >The difficulty I see with the EPD approach is that there are fields that would >be very good to have which are not defined. How many times played by super GM's >or top programs? How many wins? How many losses? How many draws? This is answered in my former reply > There is >not any bucket for lots of valuable statistical information with EPD. Of >course, you can make your own extension or even store it in c0 through c9. > Yes, if would be great if these data were usually in PGN files. >It is also possible to convert EPD to binary which is a bit faster and more >compact. >Here is a converter that will turn EPD strings into a more compact notation: >http://cap.connx.com/Public_CAP_Results/Brainy/BRAINY.ZIP Thanks will take a look
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.