Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 06:24:32 09/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 2005 at 07:04:44, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >On September 28, 2005 at 06:54:09, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 28, 2005 at 06:05:25, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >> >>>Hi all , >>> >>>the need for many games is again shown in CEGT. After a rocket-like start by >>>Fritz 9 a catastrophical first series in the match by Michael against Toga was >>>already sufficient to let it drop like a stone from highest level to below Fruit >>>currently. So it happened like we expected. >> >>Dropping like a stone? >> >>I think that a stone should be able to drop faster than that >> >>Fritz9 is still second place and first place in 4/40 list when more games were >>played by Fritz(478 games and not 288 games). >> >>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitz.html >> >> >>Here are the numbers: >>40/4 >>1 Fritz 9 2796 30 29 478 71.8 % 2634 21.8 % >>2 Fruit WCCC'05 2786 24 24 758 73.9 % 2606 22.7 % >> >>40/40 >>1 Fruit WCCC'05 2778 12 12 2219 68.6 % 2642 32.6 % >>2 Fritz 9 2769 35 35 288 61.5 % 2688 27.8 % >> >>Nothing significant was changed and the error is still too high to decide which >>version is better at 40/4 or 40/40 >> >>Uri > >Hi Uri, > >the rating lists will be updated again in the evening with around 700 games for >Fritz 9 in Blitz and more results 40/40 from the Leagues and World Trophy. > >We are again seeing that only 250 games are just a joke and people should stop >to draw conclusions from this. > I agree but what is your estimation about the number of games in such a list...........? People usually draw conclusions from 50 or even 20 games in the comp-comp field........:-( Also people always draw conclusions from 10 or less games in the hum-hum field........
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.