Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 17:51:16 09/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 2005 at 20:15:02, Albert Silver wrote: >On September 28, 2005 at 18:49:45, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>Kasimzhanov may have missed the win >> >>[d] 3R4/6pk/3p2pp/p2P1r2/P2Q4/1q5P/6PK/8 b - - 0 40 >> >>40 ...rg5 was suggested as winning >> >>as it was played a draw is likely >> >>Svidler-Adams early draw >> >>Leko lost a promising position >> >>[d] r3kb1r/1bq2pp1/p3p2p/8/Np1N1n1B/5P2/PPP2QPP/1K1RR3 w kq - 0 20 >> >>19...nb6 was analyzed by Yasser Seirawan >> >>in a very entertaining audio-visual commentary on playchess.com >> >>Tom > >I saw the game, and frankly I was very surprised that Leko didn't show more >panache in his attack. I thought that after 16...Qd6 > >[D]r3kb1r/1b3ppp/p2qp3/3n2B1/Np1N4/5P2/PPP1Q1PP/2KRR3 w kq - 0 17 > >17.f4 followed by f5 looked natural and strong. If there was a reason it was >unplayable, it eluded me while I analyzed. > > Albert Hi Albert Shredder 9 uci liked f4 New game, r3kb1r/1b3ppp/p2qp3/3n2B1/Np1N4/5P2/PPP1Q1PP/2KRR3 w kq - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 9.1 UCI: 1.Nxe6 ± (1.14) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 1.Nxe6 ² (0.64) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 1.Nxe6 fxe6 2.Qxe6+ Qxe6 3.Rxe6+ Be7 µ (-0.71) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 1.Qc4 ³ (-0.44) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 1.Qc4 ± (0.87) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 1.Qc4 ± (0.87) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 1.Kb1 ± (0.89) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 1.Kb1 ± (0.89) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 1.h3 ± (1.28) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 1.h3 ± (1.28) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 1.h3 ± (0.97) Depth: 2/10 00:00:00 1.h3 Rc8 ± (0.85) Depth: 2/10 00:00:00 1.Qc4 ± (0.87) Depth: 2/10 00:00:00 1.Qc4 Qxh2 ± (0.87) Depth: 2/10 00:00:00 1.Kb1 ± (0.89) Depth: 2/10 00:00:00 1.Kb1 Qxh2 ± (0.89) Depth: 2/10 00:00:00 1.Kb1 Qd7 2.b3 ± (0.85) Depth: 3/10 00:00:00 1.Kb1 Qd7 ² (0.60) Depth: 4/10 00:00:00 1.Kb1 Qd7 2.b3 Qc7 = (0.25) Depth: 4/10 00:00:00 1.Qd3 ² (0.26) Depth: 4/10 00:00:00 1.Qd3 Rc8 2.h3 a5 ² (0.50) Depth: 4/10 00:00:00 1.Qd3 Rc8 2.h3 Be7 3.Bxe7 ² (0.64) Depth: 5/15 00:00:01 1.Qd3 Rc8 2.h3 Qd7 3.Qb3 Qc7 ² (0.59) Depth: 6/15 00:00:01 22kN 1.Qd3 Rc8 2.Qf5 Be7 3.Nxe6 fxe6 4.Rxe6 ² (0.36) Depth: 7/24 00:00:01 63kN 1.Qd3 Rc8 = (0.11) Depth: 8/20 00:00:01 134kN 1.Qd3 Rc8 2.Re4 h6 3.Rh4 Qd7 4.Qb3 Be7 = (0.06) Depth: 8/23 00:00:01 174kN 1.Kb1 = (0.07) Depth: 8/23 00:00:01 203kN 1.Kb1 Rc8 2.Nb3 Qxh2 3.Na5 Qg3 = (0.08) Depth: 8/23 00:00:01 219kN 1.Kb1 Rc8 = (-0.17) Depth: 9/20 00:00:03 421kN 1.Kb1 h6 2.Bd2 Rc8 3.h3 Qd7 4.b3 Qc7 5.Qd3 = (-0.20) Depth: 9/20 00:00:03 456kN 1.Qd3 = (-0.19) Depth: 9/20 00:00:03 473kN 1.Qd3 Qd7 2.Qb3 Be7 3.Bxe7 Qxe7 4.Kb1 0-0 5.Nf5 = (0.05) Depth: 9/25 00:00:03 587kN 1.Qd3 Be7 2.Bxe7 Qxe7 3.Nf5 Qg5+ 4.Ne3 Rc8 = (-0.19) Depth: 10/32 00:00:04 1269kN 1.Kb1 = (-0.18) Depth: 10/32 00:00:05 1314kN 1.Kb1 h6 2.Nc5 hxg5 3.Ndxe6 fxe6 4.Nxb7 Qc6 5.Qe5 a5 = (0.02) Depth: 10/32 00:00:05 1358kN 1.Qe4 = (0.03) Depth: 10/32 00:00:05 1589kN 1.Qe4 ² (0.38) Depth: 10/32 00:00:05 1657kN 1.Qe4 Rc8 ² (0.38) Depth: 10/32 00:00:05 1963kN 1.Qe4 a5 2.Qd3 Qd7 ² (0.35) Depth: 11/28 00:00:06 2882kN 1.f4 ² (0.36) Depth: 11/35 00:00:07 3729kN 1.f4 b3 2.axb3 h6 3.Nxe6 ² (0.61) Depth: 11/35 00:00:08 4394kN 1.f4 g6 2.f5 h6 3.fxg6 hxg5 4.gxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe6 Kg8 6.Qg4 ± (0.85) Depth: 12/30 00:00:10 5529kN 1.f4 g6 2.f5 h6 3.fxg6 hxg5 4.gxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe6 Rc8 6.Qg4 Be7 7.Qf5+ Ke8 8.Re5 b3 ± (0.83) Depth: 13/32 00:00:14 7678kN 1.f4 Rc8 2.f5 Be7 3.Bxe7 Qxe7 4.fxe6 0-0 5.Kb1 Nf4 6.Qg4 Nxe6 7.Nxe6 fxe6 8.Nb6 Rc6 9.Nc4 ± (0.83) Depth: 14/37 00:00:26 13736kN 1.f4 Rc8 2.Kb1 g6 3.Qg4 h5 4.Qh3 b3 5.Qxb3 Qb4 6.g3 Qxb3 7.axb3 Bd6 ± (0.81) Depth: 15/40 00:00:54 28732kN 1.f4 Rc8 ± (1.06) Depth: 16/41 00:01:24 44565kN 1.f4 g6 2.f5 h6 3.fxg6 hxg5 4.gxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe6 b3 6.axb3 ± (1.17) Depth: 16/44 00:02:05 66582kN (, 28.09.2005) Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.