Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:54:10 09/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2005 at 10:36:58, Uri Blass wrote: >position is from analysis of the game Svidler-Adams > > >The israeli magazine in hebrew chessnet give analysis of the game but >unfortunately it seems that they do not use Fruit2.2 for the analysis > >Here is a link: > >http://www.chessnet.co.il/WCC/games/round1_heb.htm > >They claim that adams has a forced draw and surprisingly they give the line >24...Rb1 25.Qxb1? Bxb1 26.Rxb1 Ra8?(you cannot understand the moves that are in >hebrew but you probably can see them by clicking on them and seeing the board) > >I did not believe that analysis and gave Fruit2.2 to analyze and it does not see >forced draw. > >Black can play 26...Bc7 instead of 26...Ra8 and Fruit2.2 on A1000 64 mbytes hash >says > >New game - Fruit 2.1, 40'/40 Tel-Aviv >[D]5rk1/5p1p/p1p2qp1/2N5/3P1b2/2P2B2/R4PPP/1R4K1 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fruit 2.2: > >26...Re8 27.Rxa6 Qf5 28.Raa1 > ³ (-0.67) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 >26...Re8 27.Rxa6 Qf5 28.Rba1 Qc2 29.Bxc6 > = (-0.07) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >26...Re8 27.Rxa6 Qf5 28.Rba1 Qc2 29.Bxc6 > = (-0.07) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >26...Re8 27.Rxa6 Qf5 28.Rba1 Qc2 29.Bxc6 > = (-0.07) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >26...Re8 27.Rxa6 Qf5 28.Rba1 Qc2 29.Bxc6 > = (-0.07) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >26...Re8 27.Rxa6 Qf5 28.Rba1 Qc2 29.Bxc6 > = (-0.07) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >26...Re8 27.Rxa6 Qf5 28.Rba1 Qc2 29.Bxc6 > = (-0.07) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >26...Re8 27.Rxa6 Qf5 28.Rba1 Qc2 29.Bxc6 > = (-0.07) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >26...Ra8 27.Rxa6 Rxa6 28.Nxa6 Qf5 29.Rb7 > ³ (-0.51) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >26...Ra8 27.Rba1 Re8 28.Rxa6 Qh4 29.g3 > ³ (-0.53) Depth: 6/14 00:00:00 41kN >26...Ra8 27.Rba1 Kg7 28.Rxa6 Rxa6 29.Rxa6 Qe7 30.Ra1 > ³ (-0.56) Depth: 7/16 00:00:00 97kN >26...Ra8 27.Rba1 Kg7 28.Rxa6 Rxa6 29.Rxa6 Qf5 30.Be4 Qh5 31.Bxc6 Qxh2+ 32.Kf1 > ³ (-0.36) Depth: 8/21 00:00:00 176kN >26...Rb8 27.Rxb8+ Bxb8 28.Rxa6 Qf4 29.Nd3 Qxh2+ 30.Kf1 Qh1+ 31.Ke2 Qb1 32.Kd2 c5 >33.dxc5 > ³ (-0.43) Depth: 8/22 00:00:01 284kN >26...Rb8 27.Rxb8+ Bxb8 28.Rxa6 Kg7 29.Bxc6 Qf4 30.g3 Qc1+ 31.Kg2 Qxc3 32.Ra4 Bd6 > ³ (-0.52) Depth: 9/26 00:00:02 442kN >26...Rb8 27.Rba1 a5 28.Nd7 Bxh2+ 29.Kf1 Qf5 30.Nxb8 Bxb8 31.Bxc6 Qd3+ 32.Re2 >Qxc3 > = (-0.20) Depth: 10/28 00:00:05 1235kN >26...Ra8 27.Rba1 Kg7 28.Rxa6 Rxa6 29.Rxa6 Bb8 30.Rxc6 Qf4 31.Kf1 Qc1+ 32.Ke2 >Qxc3 > ³ (-0.53) Depth: 10/28 00:00:07 1686kN >26...Bc7 27.Nxa6 Bd6 28.Rab2 Qf4 29.Bxc6 Qxh2+ 30.Kf1 Rc8 31.Rb6 h5 32.g3 > µ (-0.76) Depth: 10/28 00:00:10 2570kN >26...Bc7 27.Rxa6 Qf4 28.Kf1 Qxh2 29.g3 Qh3+ 30.Bg2 Qg4 31.Re1 Bd6 32.Rxc6 > ³ (-0.40) Depth: 11/28 00:00:12 3130kN >26...Bc7 27.Rxa6 Qf4 28.Kf1 Qxh2 29.g3 Qh3+ 30.Bg2 Qh5 31.Kg1 Re8 32.Bxc6 Re2 >33.Ra8+ Kg7 > ³ (-0.39) Depth: 12/30 00:00:22 5549kN >26...Bc7 27.Rxa6 Qf4 28.Kf1 Qxh2 29.g3 Qh3+ 30.Bg2 Qh5 31.Kg1 Re8 32.Bxc6 Re2 >33.Ra8+ Kg7 > ³ (-0.39) Depth: 13/35 00:00:33 8743kN >26...Bc7 27.Rxa6 Qf4 28.Kf1 Qxh2 29.g3 Bxg3 30.fxg3 Qxg3 31.Bxc6 Qxc3 32.Ra4 Rd8 >33.Rb7 h5 34.Re7 Rxd4 35.Rxd4 Qxd4 > ³ (-0.69) Depth: 14/36 00:01:04 17185kN >26...Bc7 27.Rxa6 Qf4 28.Kf1 Qxh2 29.g3 Bxg3 30.fxg3 Qxg3 31.Bxc6 Qxc3 32.Ra4 Rd8 >33.Rb3 Qd2 34.Rb7 Rxd4 35.Rxd4 Qxd4 > ³ (-0.68) Depth: 15/44 00:01:42 27755kN >26...Bc7 27.Rxa6 Qf4 28.Kf1 Qxh2 29.Ke2 Bd6 30.Rxc6 Re8+ 31.Kd3 Qf4 32.Ne4 Be7 >33.Rb7 f5 34.Nd2 Bd6 35.Bd5+ Kh8 > ³ (-0.69) Depth: 16/44 00:03:22 55162kN >26...Bc7 27.Re1 Ra8 28.Rb2 a5 29.Rb7 Qd6 30.g3 a4 31.Be2 a3 32.Bc4 Kg7 33.Na6 a2 >34.Ra1 Rxa6 35.Bxa6 > µ (-0.90) Depth: 17/48 00:23:07 366680kN > >(Blass, Tel-Aviv 29.09.2005) > >Uri I think that it may be interesting to see analysis of Fritz9 and Fritz8 bilbao for comparison My stupid Fritz seems to be unable to see the advantage of black and cannot see Bc7 in a few minutes but I have not Fritz8 bilbao or Fritz9. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.