Author: Günther Simon
Date: 09:18:15 09/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2005 at 12:11:29, Christian Koch wrote: >On September 29, 2005 at 12:05:11, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: > >>On September 29, 2005 at 10:38:07, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>> >>>> >>>>Note you have not to send any emails fingerprints etc. >>> >>>NO! Why ask You me about such problematic Engines like Fruit 2.2 ? >>> >>>german: ganz im Ernst: solche Engines möchte ich nicht einmal geschenkt haben, >>>das ist kein Witz, testet es! >>> >>>Best, >>>Eduard. >>> >>>>Kind regards >>>>Bernhard >>>> >> >>Dear Eduard, >> >>you talk about a couple of cases which do not mean anything in the general >>assessment of the program. Besides, the games were played at very fast levels >>and I have no idea what hash was used etc. Please keep an eye on the CEGT or >>SSDF lists for independent testing! Of course, you can either keep it or leave >>it. But please have in mind that Fruit plays the best end game of all engines >>without using TB's. >> >>German for you :-) >> >>Sie können es nehmen oder es lassen. Halten Sie bitte ein Auge auf der CEGT und >>SSDF unabhängigen Prüfung. Sie sprechen nur ungefähr zwei oder drei Fälle, die >>nichts in einer allgemeinen Abbildung bedeuten :-))) >> >>Fruit spielt das beste Ende Spiel aller Motoren, keine TB's. >> >> >>Djordje > >good shot Djorddje :-) > >Eduard is watching too much blitz games, drawing conclusuins from this. > >Christian Too say it even more precisely, too much blitz _server_ games, two conditions which can flaw all results, but he will never believe. He never followed any reasonable arguments in the past... BTW who knows, if Fruit 2.2 really would play Kd3? in a working setup? (I don't have it) Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.