Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 01:17:27 03/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 1999 at 23:27:27, KarinsDad wrote: >On March 05, 1999 at 17:24:00, Paulo Soares wrote: > >>On March 05, 1999 at 15:24:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On March 05, 1999 at 14:52:37, Charles Unruh wrote: >>> >>>> Kasparov as far as i can see is stronger (20-30 points) stronger than he's >>>>ever been before. A loss by 1 point in a 6 game match doesn't tell who is the >>>>stronger player, the only thing that can be said about the match is that it >>>>proved that deep blue was very strong, how strong exactly is still a question. >>>>Just as kasp won the 2 game he could have won a 7th game so the answer is as i >>>>said how strong deep blue is still uncertain, ESPECIALLY because it only played >>>>one person(even though it was kasp) and not enough games. >>>> The question though is that it seems that just as deep blue was an improvement >>>>over deep thought it appears Kasparov1999 is stronger than kasparovof just a >>>>couple of years ago. >>>> >>>>Kasp leads over anand by 3 points and over Kramnik by 2 after 9 rounds in >>>>category 20, 5 wins with black unbelievable!!!!!! He can't be stopped, he can't >>>>be contained he is da man! Play the Rocky Balboa music!!! >>> >>>He is playing very strongly. However, today, the game was most interesting >>>in that he was winning, then he made a move that led to a draw, then Anand >>>played a move that should have lost the game, followed by a bad move by Kasparov >>>that turned the loss into a draw again... etc. >>> >>>But you are right, it does seem that no one at Linares can even stay on the >>>board with him. It is almost like he 'doesn't belong' there at all, as he is >>>giving _everyone_ there a chess lesson when they play him. >> >>Robert, >> >>Kasparov was never so distant of its opponents as now, and one >>of the reasons for that I believe that is due to the chess programs, that >>activated the study of new variants a lot. > >Hard to say whether the programs are helping him. His good performance could be >due to him studying for over a year in preparation for a world championship >match that never occurred (and whether programs helped him significantly there >can only be answered by him). In his last tournament, Kasparov won it by .5 of a >point and drew most of the top players. He is playing extremely well (especially >in Linares), do not get me wrong. However, he isn't quite the dominating player >that people are making him out to be. They are looking at one tournament and >making quick judgments. Only time will tell. > >KarinsDad > >>He and its team should be finding very complex variants, >>that adapt to its style of aggressive game. >>The idea that I have is the one that <cz1l1>Kasparov<cz1l0>, for his talent, >>adapted >>better to the new reality of the chess than the other players. >> >>Best regards, >> >>Paulo Soares, from Brazil Karinsdad, Words of Kasparov in the interview in the end of the tournamant Hoogovens/99: "I like working on chess with the computer. I can go into positions I wouldn't have dared play before. I do a lot of work and thanks to the computer, I just know the outcome of certain positions. In my game with Kramnik today, for instance, I knew beforehand that the ending was drawn. So I knew I could use this line. A few years ago, I didn't even dare take a look at this variation." I understand that with these words he affirms that the chess programs are indispensable. I intencional placed the part of the interview where he speaks of the game against Kramnik. He was playing to drawn, for two reasons: he would be the champion and, evidently, he respects Kramnik. I think that his preparation for the match for the world championship must have helped, you have reason, but until point? One match against an only adversary is well different of a tournament. In the match of Hoogovens, Kasparov made 10 points in 13 possible, with 8 wins, 4 drawns and one defeat. Anand made 9.5 points, with 6 wins and 7 drawns, and Kramnik 8 points, 3 wins and 10 drawns, the numbers shows an excellent resulted. I do not agree when you write "Only time will tell ", therefore Kasparov is the best player of the world since 1984. Based in the words of Kasparov, I would say that already we are living a new historical phase of the chess, a chess where new variants, some upper-class complex, appear with more frequency in the games, a chess where Kasparov, that of course has his games analyzedes to the extremity, has more easiness to create new alternatives,because the dynamism that is proportionate for the computers. Best regards, Paulo Soares, from Brazil.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.