Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: that is complete nonsense see the cegt-ratinglist

Author: Thomas Lagershausen

Date: 05:38:13 09/30/05

Go up one level in this thread


On September 30, 2005 at 08:18:08, Thomas Logan wrote:

>On September 30, 2005 at 07:43:29, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>
>>
>>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rangliste.html
>>
>>Fruit WCCC`5 = Fruit 2.2
>>
>>We have a new No. 1 in computerchess.
>>
>>TL
>
>Fruit may be the strongest engine in the world or it may not be
>
>In my view however this is not decided by a 40/40 nunn rating list
>
>Play them at classical time control
>
>let them each use their own book
>
>then you will have the strongest in the world
>
>Tom

First,i am not interested in booktesting. I am interested in the strongest
machine that give me good advices in positions that are not included in
openingbooks, for example the recent games of the top 8 in argentinia.

Second, classical time control is a matter of your hardware.If your hardware is
not the fastest you can´t say that 40/40 games is not the same as the games you
play on your pc. Most of the people have slower machines as in the cegt-test
used, so this games could be classical time control games of the users at home.

And third, i don´t believe that the machine makes a differnce of 40/ or 40/120.
The machine will run the same program and can see a lot of tactical stuff.

TL





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.