Author: Graham Banks
Date: 17:41:39 09/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2005 at 20:30:43, Steve B wrote: >>It could easily have played it. Remember I published my comparative results on >>my 624 MHz PDA as being roughly 15 times slower than my Athlon at 2GHz? This is >>65+% slower than that same PDA. >> >>The problem is that you see the 0 seconds and somehow presume it must be similar >>after all zero times 15 is still zero. My testing showed that those fractions of >>a second can easily be 0.7 or 0.8 seconds for example, so multiply that by >>40-50, add to that the time trouble, and it becomes VERY believable. > > >thanks for the assist Albert > >not often i am called a cheater.. >especially in technical Pc engine printouts i dont even understand >:)) > >Steve I don't know if I'd be that strong about Uri's post. I don't necessarily think he was accusing you of cheating. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.