Author: Albert Silver
Date: 17:59:28 09/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2005 at 18:31:29, Christian Koch wrote:
>On September 30, 2005 at 18:13:37, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On September 30, 2005 at 16:43:25, Christian Koch wrote:
>>
>>>On September 30, 2005 at 16:37:33, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 30, 2005 at 16:15:01, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>You really believed I could organize such a match?
>>>>>You are naive, sir, whoever you are.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Amazed Regards
>>>>>fernando
>>>>
>>>> I've done this match for you at time control
>>>> 5m+3s and it ended with 998,0-2,0 in favour
>>>> of Fruit 2.1 -:) -:)
>>>> Kurt
>>>
>>>Hmm totally reversed result here:
>>>
>>>Chess Challenger 7 has won against Fruit 2.2 with 3,5 - 2,5 at longer time
>>>control (40 moves in 2880 minutes / rest in 1 month).
>>>
>>>best regards,
>>>Christian
>>Even if we assume that your result is correct
>>do not forget that Fruit is only 2 years old and is going to improve when Chess
>>Challenger7 is aready old.
>>
>>Considering this I think that it is better to invest money on fruit because
>>there is a hope that it is going to improve when there is no hope that Chess
>>Challenger 7 is going to improve.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Sure, investing money in Fruit is the best way!!
>
>But tomorow my Ches Challenger 7 will be tuned like hell:-) Processor uprade and
>filling more memory gaps with soem 4, 5 and 6 men tablebases.
>
>Christian
Yes, the memory will be necessary. Last I read, it had enough trouble with 2
piece tablebases....
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.