Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 23:11:33 09/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2005 at 19:19:07, Marc-Olivier Moisan-Plante wrote: >Hi Marc, > >By curiosity are you the book builder of Fruit 2.1's small_book.bin? If it is 7/9/2005 and 260K then it was probably me. >I would like to say that I find this little book quite solid despite its size. >In my own testing (done for fun, blitz control, few games - nothing serious >here), I rarely see Fruit 2.1 (or other uci-engine that I endowed with that >book, doing bad after the book ends). Small but solid. Computers often do well with reduced books. Over a long period of time against a program with learning, problems would develop, however. >I could be wrong (because I don't use chessbase interface very often), but I >noticed that Fruit 2.1 is doing better with small_book.bin than fruit_ASv3.ctg >against Fritz 8 (again maybe I don't have enough games here to say something >serious - this is just my impression). > >An exeption might be the following line: 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e4 Nc6 4. Be3 >Nf6 5. Nc3 e5 6. d5 Na5 7.Nf3 Bd6 8. Qa4 bd7 9. Qa5 a6!? and then white (i.e. >fruit 2.1) is bookless against Prodeo (which might have one of the best >"amateur" book - if we agree that Prodeo is an "amateur" program). This is a >tricky line. > >PS: (If your are the author..) Is the original pgn from small_book.bin >available? (I don't expect so.) This is the PGN I used. I do not know if this is the stuff you are after though. http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new-approach/super.pgn.bz2 >Thanks and good luck with Fruit 2.2,
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.