Author: James T. Walker
Date: 04:07:26 10/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 01, 2005 at 06:34:33, Chris Conkie wrote: >On October 01, 2005 at 05:54:42, James T. Walker wrote: > >>You keep saying "we". Do you have a mouse in your pocket? You may not be alone >>but you are certainly in the minority. I don't mind an engine capturing a king >>if it's available. I have done this while playing chess myself on a real >>chessboard in blitz games. > >Each to their own, and we (that includes the ICGA) don't approve of plagarism. Your post are getting more bizarre. I don't approve of plagiarism either. What does this have to do with Fritz 9 engine? Does the ICGA share your opinion that Fritz 9 has a bug because when operated inside of Chessbase 8 it ignores some of the chess rules? > >>Also, you claim to have proof that the problem is in Fritz 9 but did not explain >>how you know. I'd be interested in that. > >The older ChessBase GUI's do not protect/hide how the engines implement the >rules. Take Fritz9 and use it inside ChessBase 8.0 or below and you will see >that the most fundamental part of chess engine programming is not implemented. Sorry but that is not proof that Fritz 9 has a problem. Maybe it is proof that Chessbase 8 or below does. > >They have been told numerous times about this to no avail...... > >Look.....here is their office. ;) > >http://www.fetchfido.co.uk/games/magnetcote/magnetcote.htm What is this? > >Type in "Fritz9 does not work" and watch a how a typical support request is >dealt with..... That is your idea of a bug report? Why bother? > >:) > >Regards > >Chris
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.