Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kasparov vs Polgar

Author: Mike Byrne

Date: 10:10:46 10/02/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 02, 2005 at 12:59:17, Uri Blass wrote:

>On October 02, 2005 at 12:49:43, Mike Byrne wrote:
>
>>On October 02, 2005 at 12:41:51, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>
>>>On October 02, 2005 at 12:27:17, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 02, 2005 at 12:07:02, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On October 02, 2005 at 11:28:13, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On October 02, 2005 at 10:46:25, Mike Byrne wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On October 02, 2005 at 10:35:48, Amused To Death wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Is there A web site that covers the game where Gary touched the pawn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It was not a pawn , it was a knight.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A38229-2000Jul3&notFound=true
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>halfway down the story
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"In 1994 in Linares, Spain, Kasparov played a knight move against Judit Polgar
>>>>>>>and removed his fingers from that piece. But after he saw that he might lose
>>>>>>>material, he took the knight back and made a different move. His act was caught
>>>>>>>on camera by a Spanish television crew, but Polgar was so shocked that she
>>>>>>>froze, uncapable to protest and soon lost the game. "
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>do google search on "polgar+kasparov+knight+Linares+touched"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The story is different than when I first heard it. What I had read years ago, is
>>>>>>Kasparov touched the square with his Knight, for all of a quarter second then
>>>>>>moved it to the correct square. Polgar could have held him to the touch square
>>>>>>rule, but this is the first time I've heard that Kasparov removed his fingers
>>>>>>from the piece.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>At this point, I'd rather see the footage, then read a report.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Terry
>>>>>
>>>>>JFYI, there isn´t a "touch square rule" in chess. Touching a square is allowed.
>>>>>Kasparov has released the piece.
>>>>>
>>>>>Michael
>>>>
>>>>Ah...yeah there is Micheal....touch square touch piece, etc. You don't have to
>>>>release the piece.
>>>>
>>>>Go through the all rules concerning this. FIDE USCF CFC etc. I'll be surprised
>>>>to see this rule changed.
>>>
>>>What are you talking about? As long as you haven´t released the piece you are
>>>entitled to move it on another square.
>>>Of course I don´t know about USCF rules and I don´t care, in Linares FIDE rules
>>>applied.
>>>
>>>Michael
>>
>>There is no "touch square" in USCF either - Terry is mistaken.  You can touch
>>every sqaure with a piece and still place the piece on any square.  This issue
>>here is that Kasparov let go of the knight and moved a different piece.
>>Obviously once you let go, that move with has has to be played to that sqaure
>>(if legal of course).  If the sqaure is not legal, that piece still has to be
>>moved.  Only if it would be illegal to move that piece can you get away with it.
>> Unless you're Garry Kasparov.  ;>)
>>
>>best,
>>
>>Michael
>
>No
>I agree that touching the square is not the problem but
>Kasparov left the knight in the wrong square and later tried to move to another
>square.
>
>"left" means putting the knight in a square and stopping to touch it for a short
>time(in the game there was something like 1/3 second that the hand of kasparov
>did not touch the knight).
>
>Uri

I think you and I agree - he let go of the piece - that is the touch piece rule
- once let goof teh piece (even for .3 seconds)  he could not move it again.  I
think I was unclear - but you can touch every sqaure witha piece while
continuosuly holding onto it.  There is no touch square rule that Terry is
suggesting.  I doubt there ever was rule like that - and there has not been a
rule liek that since I have been playing chess (1972).

best,

Michael



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.