Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:47:00 10/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2005 at 10:31:02, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>On October 03, 2005 at 10:18:30, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On October 03, 2005 at 10:02:38, Andreas Schwartmann wrote:
>>
>>>I am running a match between Fritz 9 and Fruit 2.2 right now.
>>>
>>>- Hardware: AMD Athon 64 X2 3800+ @ 2300 MHz, 2 GB RAM.
>>>- Hash tables: 512 MB each
>>>- Own books
>>>- Permanent brain (2 CPU system!)
>>>- Time: 60+15
>>>- Length: 50 games
>>>
>>>
>>>After 42 games, Fruit 2.2 is leading with a powerful 28:14!
>>>
>>>I will publish the games after the 50 games are finished.
>>>
>>>I know that 50 games are not really enough for a clear evaluation of an engine's
>>>playing strength. But it looks like Fruit is the major contender for the #1 spot
>>>on the rating list.
>>>
>>>Andreas
>>
>>I wonder if the reason is not a bad book of Fritz because in CEGT I do not see
>>similiar results.
>>
>>Uri
>
> Hi Uri
> It can happen ... although 28,0-14,0 looks a bit
> shocking for Fritz 9. Results of other matches
> between these two engines can be found at
> http://f50.parsimony.net/forum202220/messages/10718.htm
> and
> http://www.utzingerk.com/fritz9_test.htm
> Regards
> Kurt
It's not that shocking compared to your own results against Toga (19.5-30.5).
Presuming the new Fruit to indeed be stronger, then the result he is reporting
is quite consistent.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.