Author: Greg Simpson
Date: 08:30:07 10/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2005 at 10:18:30, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 03, 2005 at 10:02:38, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: > >>I am running a match between Fritz 9 and Fruit 2.2 right now. >> >>- Hardware: AMD Athon 64 X2 3800+ @ 2300 MHz, 2 GB RAM. >>- Hash tables: 512 MB each >>- Own books >>- Permanent brain (2 CPU system!) >>- Time: 60+15 >>- Length: 50 games >> >> >>After 42 games, Fruit 2.2 is leading with a powerful 28:14! >> >>I will publish the games after the 50 games are finished. >> >>I know that 50 games are not really enough for a clear evaluation of an engine's >>playing strength. But it looks like Fruit is the major contender for the #1 spot >>on the rating list. >> >>Andreas > >I wonder if the reason is not a bad book of Fritz because in CEGT I do not see >similiar results. > >Uri It's beginning to look like Fritz 9 is more aggressive than the other top programs, which is giving it very high scores against weak engines but leaving it weaker head-to-head against the very best.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.