Author: blass uri
Date: 13:07:29 03/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 07, 1999 at 11:47:42, KarinsDad wrote: >Yes, but Kasparov had a loss in that tournament whereas Anand and Kramnik did >not. Yes, he did win the tournament, but if the computer helped him out so much, >why did he not win it by more than .5 (or even by 1 in an attempt to beat >Kramnik?)? There is a simple possible explanation. The computer also helped other players and everyone is better because of the computer. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.